Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with
the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or
might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
History has many benefits and demerits. Knowing about the past has led to people embracing their past. Au contraire, it has also led to emergence of contemns among several human factions. However, the advantage of history surpass its disadvantage. Hence, knowing about the past, which subsumes important lessons, is important to make substantial decisions in the contemporary world.
To begin with, history helps human subjugate challenges. History, which is set by our progenitors and forebears, serve as a provenance of stimulation during our encounter with quandaries. Societies learn old gambits and stratagems used to face adversaries. People learn how to concoct elixirs for intricate maladies. Also, the knowledge of histocial settlements, such as Rome and Egypt, has contributed to saliently to the development of modern world. Without this knowledge, there is high chances of countries foundering tremendously while facing enigmas
Furthermore, by knowing about the past, we learn to elude past mistakes while facing imbroglios. History has taught us how shirk from gaffes of wars such World War I and II. Past wars, which are gravely perilous to the existence of biotas, has helped nations to prepare better for the future through the acquisition of hindsights about these wars. These records also serve to remind humans about the effect of wars. Through the acquisition of the past knowledge, humans has also learned how to avoid wherewithals that could lead massacre, anthrax or death.
However, some well-learned individuals might cavil that history propels ire. These people might base their argument on the fact that history, which brings back both negative and positive occurrences, might lead to resurgence of sedition. This might be true to some extent. However, this same history has helped us embrace our culture. Through the knowledge of past events, we are able to appreciate our ancestor’s artifacts. We also tend to value vestiges from the past.
In conclusion, the world cannot be fully developed without any iota of reference to the past. Through the knowledge of the past, humans have learnt to circumvent faux pas, value art and culture, and take on dilemmas. Therefore, to make important decision, it is pertinent for nations, organizations and individuals to advert back to history.
|2022-08-23||Sujan Adhikari||70||Read full essay|
|2022-07-21||idris oriyomi||58||Read full essay|
|2022-05-12||Millan||50||Read full essay|
|2022-05-05||Medulla||50||Read full essay|
|2022-01-29||ishi_jais||50||Read full essay|
- The following appeared in a memo from the new vice president of Sartorian a company that manufactures men s clothing Five years ago at a time when we had difficulty obtaining reliable supplies of high quality wool fabric we discontinued production of our 78
- Knowing about the past cannot help people to make important decisions today Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supportin58
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful58
- The following memorandum is from the president of Primo Doll Manufacturing Inc According to a survey last year of parents who purchased the Elkie our most popular doll 90 percent reported that although their children were extremely satisfied with the doll58
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1966.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41597796143 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84700314741 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559228650138 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6849309673 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.9166666667 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.125 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54166666667 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195773705825 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0520191476963 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552531585199 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113404309033 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367708784351 0.0667264976115 55% => OK
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.56 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.