Certain societies considers the leadership and a leader as an infalliable figure as the leader needs to guide teams. In fact, taking other people's opinions is tantamount to a weakness in the leadership in these societies. While it is essential for leaders to guide and visualise their aims and missions, facilitating constructive feedback from team members and the community is paramount for cultivating impartiality and throughness of leaders' decisions in both political and busienss situations.
In politics, elected officials by the community are prone to possess biases due to the nature of democracy in many countries. Politicians, thus, act as an agent for their community members and policies that they are partial to and propose are likely to stem from opinions of a majority of the community. However, the politicians must be representative of their regional individuals including minorities. Listening to criticism and valuable comments from all classes of the community is critical for representatives to guide non-prejudiced decisions.
In business, leaders of a company and teams face similar situations. When integrating different feedback from team members, apart from the benefit that equity can be achieved, leaders may be able to reduce or mitigate risks. Operational members who are knowledgeable of down-to-earth dangers or opportunities could provide useful information for the leaders to make decisions.
There may be arguments against leaders incorporating various comments from followers into their judgement. These opponents may advance their perspective with the general tendency that leaders have greater prowess in the matters while they also have access to experts more freely. Though this may be true, maintaining fairness and obtaining day-to-day information on business cannot be accomplished without taking into consideration of the people who leaders guide and support. Also, the community and team members, who witness some of their suggestions are addressed, will provide better support for the leaders in executing their ideas.
In short, while holding core values and missions, leaders will benefit from encouraging feedback from followers and implementing practical and feasible comments. By doing so, their followers would feel more empowered and be able to assist in achieving what leaders wish to execute.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he leader needs to guide teams. In fact, taking other peoples opinions is tantamo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, so, thus, while, apart from, in fact, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2000.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68181818182 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09099264593 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 621.0 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5630872446 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.0 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239079907156 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771942957478 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0498070892028 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139723607425 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421067448006 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 48.8420337079 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.38706741573 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.