Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
A modern society in many countries has a predilection to bring up specialists and experts in particular areas in order to maximise problem-solving opportunities. Indeed, individuals who spent a greater time on the fields that they were interested in at a university can be prepared for recondite concepts and practices in technology and engineering, which make up a significant portion of work in the current era. Thus, it is not surprising that there are a number of proponents who wish to empower students to focus on the domain that they are passionate for. I largely agree with this perspective considering efficiency of time and resources that students possess, while we must not give up providing pedagogy for students to be well-rounded and cross-disciplined to play their role as society members.
To begin with, students in universities tend to own limited time and funds. To be good at in a specific domain, regardless whether the field is obscure or not, one needs investments in the form of funds and hours of efforts. If universities were to increase the volume of conditions for a graduation such as requiring taking more courses from other departments, students will have to place less resources in the field that wish to pursue and assign more time and efforts to other studies.
On a similar note, if universities mandate requirements imposing students to undertake irrelevant subjects, students, who lack resources, may incur greater debts by the time they graduate and joining a workforce in the community may be postponed further. As such, universities a large number of compulsory lectures from the fields that students are not eager to pursue may burden students in the end.
With all these suggestions, however, it is paramount for students to be able to emphasize and have compassion for other community members as well as be capable of doing basic mathematics to go to markets everyday. To do so, recommending a small number of foundational courses in humanities and sciences by universities will benefit students to prepare for the society that they will contribute to and to obtain fundamental skills that they would need on a daily life.
Overall, to reduce burdens of students lacking time and money, it is advisable that students allocate their resources in exploring the areas that they would like to major in. Nonetheless, it should not be overlooked that pillars of necessary prowess such as basic mathematics and an ability to interact other society members need to be emphasized.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 278, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ostponed further. As such, universities a large number of compulsory lectures from the fields tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 205, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...oing basic mathematics to go to markets everyday. To do so, recommending a small number ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 238, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
...arkets everyday. To do so, recommending a small number of foundational courses in humanities and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, nonetheless, so, thus, well, while, in particular, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2123.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 412.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15291262136 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50530610838 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08193461985 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529126213592 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 671.4 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.997041342 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.307692308 118.986275619 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.6923076923 23.4991977007 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 5.21951772744 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243661684016 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0879875686266 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0528029109426 0.0758088955206 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138533784029 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360101342414 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 14.1392134831 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.38706741573 115% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 100.480337079 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.