“A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The recommendation that the same national curriculum should be used for all students across different schools may have a sound intention to establish a quality level and scope of education delivery. Nonetheless, the good quality of pedagogy can be built upon without going as far as developing identical curriculum at the national level. it is paramount to consider interests and capacity of pupils as well as different teaching styles of teachers when it comes to a high integrity of education. In addition, the resources available for each school needs to be considered.
To beging with, the author of the recommendation does not take preferences and aptitudes of students into consideration. if all students are taught with the same courses and methods, certain pupils will have difficulties in following the progress of courses. Some may prefer to learn by reading text books while others may enjoy more interactive sessions when they learn a particular subject. 'One-size-fits-all' approches to enforce to learn the same contents and attainment methods may not help students to engage with educational materials even if these materials are of superior quality.
Along with individual variations of students, teachers, who were undergone rigorous training over at least 3 years, would not have opportunities to implement their innovative or experienced teaching methodologies. This may deteriorate teachers' motivation as well as their confidence. certain teachers are more experts in delivering a seminar-type of sessions while other teachers are specialised in expalining concepts in details in a lecture style. However, the same curriculum will not allow different approaches for teachers to deliver effective education.
Not only principles of individual differences are in jeopardy, but also issues arising from impracticality would be a concern when the exactly same courses are delivered in homogeneous ways. schools will have to compete each other to identify teachers who have qualifications in the fields while allocating budget into the areas that these schools are less developed to meet the stringent requirements. Instead of specialising in providing educations that they are competent at, schools have to waste their constrained resources on standardized courses.
Overall, the intention of suggesting to construct the identical national curriculum, the consistent and integral level of knowledge delivery, can be agreed upon. Neverthless, the recommendation needs to prudently revisit fundamental and practical factors. The considerations such as individual differences in students' learning style and in teachers' lecture methods in addition to limited resources for every school would suggest to consider alternative options than costly implementation of the same national curriculum in all schools.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...tical curriculum at the national level. it is paramount to consider interests and ...
^^
Line 3, column 122, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...titudes of students into consideration. if all students are taught with the same c...
^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Certain
...motivation as well as their confidence. certain teachers are more experts in delivering...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erent approaches for teachers to deliver effective education. Not only principl...
^^
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Schools
...rses are delivered in homogeneous ways. schools will have to compete each other to iden...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 422, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'suggest considering'.
Suggestion: suggest considering
...imited resources for every school would suggest to consider alternative options than costly impleme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, well, while, at least, in addition, of course, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2409.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74940334129 5.05705443957 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24409964056 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541766109785 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 764.1 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9732837352 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.833333333 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2777777778 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.21951772744 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144744115285 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0486525776707 0.0831039109588 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046901156425 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086087675367 0.150359130593 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0489592304037 0.0667264976115 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 48.8420337079 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.1639044944 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.