The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.

It is a controversial and intricate issue if leaders should encourage feedback from the people who they lead. I'd like to argue that leaders should to some extent put importance on feedback and ideas from their subordinates and people they lead, however, they should not completely rely on their feedback, because to believe in the leader's own belief and persevere in his idea is also a necessitous nature of a great leader, therefore it is important that feedback from people and his idea are appropriately weighed. In this essay, I'd like to present why these two factors are important.

Firstly and foremostly, it is necessary for leaders to always hear from his or her people to shape an objective and manifold point of view, and incorporating different ideas would prevent leaders from turning into a dictator. If leaders are deaf to any other ideas, they are like to become dictatorial and complacent and, in the end, they will lead their people in the wrong way. There is a myriad of examples in history showing despotic leaders who never pay attention to feedback from their people, and eventually, their nation failed to prosper and the insurgency led by dissident people ended their dictatorship. In this way, leaders should encourage feedback from the people whom they lead

Having said that, it is also true that leaders need to persevere in their own beliefs because not all feedback is conducive to making a decision. A leader may be faced with unhelpful feedback, or he may be surrounded with incompetent subordinaries, or he may be simply faced with too much feedback and become irresolute. In these cases, it is crucial for leaders to believe in their own idea. After all, it is the leader who makes the final decision, therefore if they find the feedback not helpful, then he should stick to his idea. Therefore, I'd like to claim that the best leaders should encourage feedback from his people, but they should make wise use of the feedback.

One clear example of my argument can be found in the field of politics. It is a fundamental principle that the president, namely the leader of a country, to listen to the opinion of the citizen. Moreover, it is also important for the president to become a great leader that he can find a point of compromise from many conflicting idea and opinions and make a good decision that most people can agree. Thus, it means both two factors, listening to people and make good use of the feedback, are both important.

To recapitulate my idea, I agree with the idea that leaders should encourage feedback from his people to some extent, but I believe he should not completely depend on that feedback.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...feedback from the people who they lead. Id like to argue that leaders should to so...
^^
Line 1, column 532, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...e appropriately weighed. In this essay, Id like to present why these two factors a...
^^
Line 5, column 546, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...he should stick to his idea. Therefore, Id like to claim that the best leaders sho...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, after all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2206.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82713347921 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66563003056 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.442013129103 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.3057371937 60.3974514979 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.875 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5625 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458284096924 0.243740707755 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173436149975 0.0831039109588 209% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141771948333 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281632277805 0.150359130593 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114064295369 0.0667264976115 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.