How many years a leader should stay in their powerful positions is a controversial issue. We can observe various institutions take different policy. In despotic countries, the nation's leaders will often stay in power for whole their life, while in democratic countries, presidents often resign after several years. In some fields, I believe that those in power should step down after five years or shorter in fields where the environments around them change fast. In other fields especially in which people's experience counts, however, I believe that the leaders should stay in power for a longer period. Therefore it is erroneous to conclude that the claim hold true in any field.
In business, politics, and governments, it is wise that leaders resign after five years because things change extremely fast in these fields. The business plan and policy current leaders have may sound obsolete and novel ideas from new young leaders are more desirable. The circumstances a nation's facing also vary fast, thus old idea incumbent political and government leaders have are no more effective. In these cases, revitalizing through new leadership is essential because it is necessary for leaders to keep their idea and knowledge up-to-date. Consequently, changing leaders after five years helps an organization to choose a competitive leader.
Changing leaders after years is also an efficacious way to prevent any corruption within the organization. When we look at history, we can easily find a myriad of examples showing old empires and kingdoms fall apart because of internal corruption related to autocratic leaders. In these cases, leaders never change after they acquired a position in power. People around the leaders will usually try to ingratiate themself to the only leader. Leaders will be tempted to engage themselves in vicious conduct. In this way, it is likely that leaders staying too long in their powerful position will foment corruptions. Changing leaders will surely clear these corruptions and will revitalize the organization.
In other fields, regularly changing leaders does not seem an agreeable idea. In fields such as education and science, experience counts more. Should a doctor in a university relinquish their position in the university? Of course, it is an absurd idea because it is necessary for a researcher to be well experienced and therefore the longer these scholars stay in position, the greater scholars they are. On the same note, the experience is of great importance in education. The head of schools should be versed in communicating with children. Therefore, we can conclude that in these fields those in power should stay in their position longer than five years.
To recapitulate, in some fields, leaders surely need novelty and up-to-date ideas, thus regularly changing leaders is a good idea and it will also prevent corruption. However, when personal experience counts, changing leaders often is not effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 423, Rule ID: NOUN_AROUND_IT[1]
Message: Consider using 'the surrounding environments'?
Suggestion: the surrounding environments
...r five years or shorter in fields where the environments around them change fast. In other fields especially...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 465, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...e environments around them change fast. In other fields especially in which people...
^^
Line 1, column 606, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ould stay in power for a longer period. Therefore it is erroneous to conclude that the cl...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 384, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
...t political and government leaders have are no more effective. In these cases, revi...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, of course, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2500.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34188034188 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80783865676 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 215.323595506 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 774.0 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4838236715 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.5925925926 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184781806413 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556446015235 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572908836042 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104615292416 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0784552537639 0.0667264976115 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 100.480337079 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.