These days we are living in a more and more cosmopolitan world, and reserving a nation's cultural traditions are becoming difficult. Therefore we often hear people claim that the government should give financial support for the protection of traditions and it is no wonder what should the government subsidize has been a controversial issue. Although in some exceptional cases my claim does not hold true, however, I would like to argue that in most developed countries major cities should receive financial support.
First and foremost, in the contemporary world a nation's population is concentrated in cities. More people are living in the metropolitan areas, and that means modern culture often stems from cities because modern cultures often sprout where people gather. We can easily find various examples, but let's take Japan as an example. Japanese Moe-culture, which is nowadays well-known all over the world, comes from Akihabara district, an area in the center of Tokyo, which is the largest city in Japan and the capital at the same time. In this way, modern culture is frequently generated in city areas, thus it is reasonable for the government to give allowance to their primary cities for the preservation of modern cultures.
Second, cities are playing a critical role in the preservation of cultures. When we take a trip to a foreign country and visit their major cities, we almost always find museums in the city. These museums have significant importance since they usually exhibit the country's and people's history, cultures and traditions. Sometimes they even exhibit ancient cultures which have already been lost, making these museums the only place to preserve those cultures. Therefore, giving financial support for these places is of substantial importance for both protecting existing cultures and lost ones.
Having said that, I have to admit that my argument does not hold true in some cases. Consider developing countries with less urbanization compared to developed countries, in these countries, most people still live in rural areas and thus cities do not conduce to the contribution of cultures and at the same time, we can quite often observe that cultures still remain in rural areas. According to my personal experience, when I visited Kenya three years ago, I enjoyed immersing myself in local indigenous cultures and traditions by visiting local villages. In these cases, the government needs to pay attention to rural areas for the protection of their traditions.
To recapitulate, I would like to assert the claim and reason seem reasonable in developed and urbanized world, however, in developing countries these claims do not hold true.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a nation' or simply 'nations'?
Suggestion: a nation; nations
... more cosmopolitan world, and reserving a nations cultural traditions are becoming diffic...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ural traditions are becoming difficult. Therefore we often hear people claim that the gov...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...d foremost, in the contemporary world a nations population is concentrated in cities. M...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...e can easily find various examples, but lets take Japan as an example. Japanese Moe-...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, still, therefore, thus, well, as for, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2265.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 428.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29205607477 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.548423998 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76777558884 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518691588785 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 712.8 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3526293887 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.833333333 118.986275619 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7777777778 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88888888889 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266914431822 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806820897652 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053837046591 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146366268622 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507950797474 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 14.1392134831 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.