The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
For a leader, it is to make incisive decisions for their organization. And there are many ways to make that decision making even better, including to get feedback from those people whom they lead.
Feedback for a leader from the people whom they lead gives the leader more insight into the mindset of whom they are working with. From a given feedback, a leader can get an opinion on themeselves or their decisions from a different persepective. These opinions can be used by the leader not only to correct themselves, but also help them understand their peers and their mindset.
Not only that, these feedback helps the leader to correct the decisions they are about to take. As these feedbacks is comprises of opinions of people with a different mindset, the people with different mindset to that of the leader could point out some glaring contradictions in their decison. And in turn, this contradiction could be used by the leader to formulate the idea again until it becomes ironclad.
And finally, these feedback from the groups allows an overall better decision making from their leaders. As stated above, as these decision could also be corrected using the feedback, the ideas contradicting the said notion can also be corrected. And this recursion of correction and rebuttal continues on until an end decision is met amongst the two parties, which in turn encourages to make more decisions.
A democratic government is a perfect example of all the above use cases. As it is made of leaders that we elect, they are elected in the faith of doing right for us. These leaders are the ones who gets insight from all of us. Leaders from various parties clash together in passing a bill throught a tolling process of trail and error in order to reach a decision which is good for us. And if these decisions are not reached, we are the ones who can raise our voice in the concern and correct them, else we have the power to remove them from their position of leadership.
From the above points, it can be fairly concluded that the best leaders are those wo encourage feedback from the people they lead, given the decision is made in the faith that it would benifit everyone.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 16, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this feedback' or 'these feedbacks'?
Suggestion: this feedback; these feedbacks
...rs and their mindset. Not only that, these feedback helps the leader to correct the decisio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
...re about to take. As these feedbacks is comprises of opinions of people with a different min...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this feedback' or 'these feedbacks'?
Suggestion: this feedback; these feedbacks
...il it becomes ironclad. And finally, these feedback from the groups allows an overall bette...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'making'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: making
...e two parties, which in turn encourages to make more decisions. A democratic governm...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1810.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 380.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76315789474 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50271320914 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468421052632 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 704.065955056 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1746246212 60.3974514979 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.470588235 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3529411765 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.52941176471 5.21951772744 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22313532989 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873970737698 0.0831039109588 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0644431357047 0.0758088955206 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140753327298 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0403958977827 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.