"The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition."
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The youth of a country determines if a country's future is in safe hands or not. It also determines if the country's future is bright or not. Today's leaders, in almost all the fields have a sense of maturity, boldness, positive attitude towards the work they do. These are the qualities that should be present in any upcoming leader as well. Apart from this, there must also be a sense of cooperation in the leader.
Today's young generation is fiercely competitive in all senses. Be it a mere discussion on a sports game or on a political policy. They like their point to kept forward and proved right. Young people having these qualities is good as long as it does not make them adamant to their point even though they are wrong.
The society we live in today consists of leaders who have build vast business empires, great governments, etc. To run these businesses and governments or industries in the right way in order to benefit the nation or the company, a right leader must be chosen. Tomorrow's leaders are today's youth. Most of them already posses the qualities of competitiveness. But, there is an extent to which they must be competitive. If sometimes, things are not going according to their plans then for the betterment of their businesses or even the well-doing of a country, they must take the right steps and cooperate if necessary.
It is very important for the young generation to have a sense of cooperation. What if a future leader cannot cooperate no matter what? What if the person is adamant to prove their point no matter what? And if this is a person who is the leader of a great organization or company then, this decision or quality of the person will definitely be harmful for the organization in the long run.
Thus, the leaders of today's companies, teachers in schools, or even an individual who has a sense of how the world works must help the young people to instill the qualities of cooperation. Competitiveness is good to a certain extent, but beyond that the person must know if his/her decision will affect the organization in a bad way. The quality of cooperation must be instilled in the youth from the very start so that it helps them become better leaders and take better decisions as leaders.
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual60
- Of the two leading real estate firms in our town Adams Reality and Fitch Reality Adams Reality is clearly superior Adams has 40 real estate agents in contrast Fitch Reality has 25 many of whom work only part time Moreover Adams revenue last year was twice60
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia Using an observation centered approach to studying Tertian culture he concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by the60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...he leader. Todays young generation is fiercely competitive in all senses. Be i...
Line 9, column 321, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER
Message: Consider replacing "in a bad way" with adverb for "bad"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r decision will affect the organization in a bad way. The quality of cooperation must be ins...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, then, thus, well, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69543147208 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70694530555 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467005076142 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 577.8 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0383767747 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0909090909 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 23.4991977007 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146433265296 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0434795222158 0.0831039109588 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359489918825 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0821166427976 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239106028324 0.0667264976115 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.