The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The claim made here is too broad, as there is certainly not any "best" way of doing anything in this world. There are always some quirks and traits that follow with these so called "ways" of getting possible desired outcome. While the opinion stated here is too broad, I don't fully disagree with this, as the sense of cooperation should exist in a person for any leadership task but that doesn't necessarily means that it doesn't always come alongside the competitive environment.
Any person who is studying or pursuing in various fields have, to some extent, cooperatability instilled in them already, if only they are doing, whatever they do, quite seriously. Leadership is not present by birth in a person, it sometimes still exist in a person, its just that the person is not aware of this quality. So by instilling sense of cooperation in them might seem a waste of time and resources, instead they might want to spend there time, and encourage the youth onto other useful things like, skill development, etc.
Competition is the key to success, one might say. Competition boosts your skills, it shapes your endurance, your thoughtfullness, your way of sensibility, and sometimes your perspective too. A competitive environment breeds erudites. A person in an atmospheric competitoin may develop themself into a totally another level. Competition usually provides the best of the best outcome. In order to form a complete intellectual leader on shall stay into the competition from time to time.
One can only improve themself, if he can get to know the mistakes and the areas where they need to improve themself. And this can only happen through the competition.
Cooperation and competition my sometimes act proportionally or totally counteractive. It is true that one cooperative person might show a sense of competition if persuaded, but it is not the same case with a competitive person showinf cooperatability. But the probabbility of the former case is way too low where as the probable result of the later case generally is a satisfactory one.
For a society to give rise the leaders within the youth, it shall focus more towards the skill development, encouragement and created a highly motivated environment around them. Because then is the chances of creating a great competitive ground where a person can display their leadership quality and then the society can accept them or not solely basis on the cooperative behaviour. But by doing so we should not understimate the potentials of those same persons.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the opinion stated here is too broad, I dont fully disagree with this, as the sense ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...person for any leadership task but that doesnt necessarily means that it doesnt always...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t that doesnt necessarily means that it doesnt always come alongside the competitive e...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 308, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ility of the former case is way too low where as the probable result of the later case g...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, then, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13189448441 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09484848911 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.705523999 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172704566335 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480644610449 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366998593004 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799505385612 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378465447561 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 292, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the opinion stated here is too broad, I dont fully disagree with this, as the sense ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 409, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...person for any leadership task but that doesnt necessarily means that it doesnt always...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 442, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...t that doesnt necessarily means that it doesnt always come alongside the competitive e...
^^^^^^
Line 8, column 308, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ility of the former case is way too low where as the probable result of the later case g...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, still, then, while, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2140.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13189448441 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09484848911 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 682.2 704.065955056 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.705523999 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.85 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172704566335 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480644610449 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0366998593004 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0799505385612 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378465447561 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.