The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
A wise person once said that if you want to make a guess about a country's future, you can do so by looking at that country's youth. In other words, young people are the future and they will be the leaders of tomorrow. Therfore, it is very important that they have all the necessary qualities like a growth mindset, a sense of cooperation and also a sense of competition. I disagree with the claim that the younger generation should be taught a sense of cooperation and not competition for the leadership roles in different fields of life for mainly two reasons.
First and foremost, competition is everywhere. Competition is an integral part of growing up for every person in this world. For example, as soon as we go to school, there is a competition for getting good grades. During the annual athletic events in school, there is competition for getting that precious gold medal in every event you participate. Competition is part of our life from the very beginning and it cannot be changed. By competing with our fellow mates we come to know about the shortcomings, mistakes of our own. By indentifying those limitation and by working on them, one can grow not only as a student but as an individual. Competition is necessary in one or the other way in every field of life.
Secondly, Leaders of a certain field always compete for that leadership spot. Generally, there is only one leader in every field. If the young people are not made aware of the fact that they will have to compete for that one spot with several other individuals then the younger generation would not be able to lead the society towards a better future. For instance, the leaders of the political parties who fight the elections for the majority of seats in the General Assembly usually compete amongst themselves. The strategies used by them also include throwing dirt on one another, criticizing their methods and even questioning their intentions. If the leader is not able to defend himself and his political party then he/she will surely not be able to become the leader. A sense of competition is necessary and an important quality for a leader.
Although, one cannot undermine the sense of cooperation. It is also one of the important characteristic of a leader. Given that a sense of competition is equally important if not more.
In conclusion, only by instilling a sense of cooperation and not competition would not be the right way to nurture the younger generation because at some point in their life they willl come across a situation where they find themselves competing with multiple people for a single opportunity.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 544, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this limitation' or 'those limitations'?
Suggestion: this limitation; those limitations
...s, mistakes of our own. By indentifying those limitation and by working on them, one can grow no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d an important quality for a leader. Although, one cannot undermine the sense of coop...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, then, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2170.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83296213808 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81206309861 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469933184855 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 702.0 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.9293255216 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.347826087 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5217391304 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259366813493 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768714210142 0.0831039109588 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054416843053 0.0758088955206 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14436491084 0.150359130593 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562189248354 0.0667264976115 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.