The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Humans created machines to help them with their day-to-day activities. Machines assist in making daily chores easier and save a lot of time, even resources. They act as tools for various different tasks which if performed with bare human hands would require too much effort. I disagree to the statement that the human mind will always be superior to machines to some extent. There are two main reasons for the same.
To begin with, machines help in saving a lot of time required to some tedious tasks which can be used for tasks of much more importance. For instance, invention of calculator has helped in performing complex calculations in as little time as a few miliseconds. Before the invention of calculator, people used to perform complex calculations with the help of pen and paper which used to require time, resources like paper, ink, etc. Even after spending a lot of effort there used to be calculation mistakes in some cases which would eventully mean wrong results. Machines like calculator helped in solving this problem and automating the process of complex mathematical calculations. Thus, machines can be better than humans in certain tasks.
Secondly, machines have made a lot of progress in the recent times due to the boost in Artificial Intelligence. Machines nowadays can understand human emotions and interact with humans like any other human. For example, robots have a very high thinking and processing powers as compared to human beings. Robots can perform highly complex, time consuming jobs in way less time than human mind. Robots in the near future are expexted to be even better and are only going to grow.
Although some people might be of the view that after all these robots are built by humans and in fact the brilliance of human minds. They are certainly true and it makes difficult to argue to that point. But the human minds have become the slave of the technology as observed recently, people have been spending a lot of time on their electricl gadgets than using the time available into some meaningful activities. Therfore, huamns need to carefully choose the extend to which they want to ineract with the machines.
In conclusion to the points above, I believe that it is very difficult to say that human minds will alwways be superior to that of machines as it is a complex topic in general.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: IF_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'is'?
Suggestion: is
...tools for various different tasks which if performed with bare human hands would r...
^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s nowadays can understand human emotions and interact with humans like any other ...
^^
Line 7, column 459, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...erfore, huamns need to carefully choose the extend to which they want to ineract with the ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, thus, after all, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, in general, in some cases, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 397.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91183879093 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5642614301 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513853904282 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7665523375 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8571428571 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9047619048 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95238095238 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291165032028 0.243740707755 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0999184103743 0.0831039109588 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0902844504325 0.0758088955206 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191322554812 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0806550273956 0.0667264976115 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.