Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Scandals in today's modern society have been increasing at a rapid speed. The people who are involved in any such scandalous activities aim to gain financial or some kind of advantage through unethical means. This advantage may belong to the hard working class people who have the responsibilty to feed their families. It would be unfair if their hard earned money is just snatched away from them. Therefore, I disgree with the claim that Scandals are useful because they focus our attention to problems that are usually ignored for two main reasons.
First and foremost, the level of emotional and financial distress caused to the innocent, hard working people due to the scandals can not be compared to the problem faced by the government bodies. For instance, if a huge businessman frauds a bank by running away without repaying a huge loan and eventually the bank has to shut down, the people who saved their money in that bank in their respective bank accounts would never get their money back. In this way, the government and bank may come to know about their faults and problems but for the middle class people it might be at a cost of their entire life savings. This is clearly not worth it or fair.
Secondly, there are several other ways to address the existing problems in the modern society. If scandals are used to detect the problems, it would only encourage more and more people to be involved in such scandalous activities. For example, if a certain government does not address the scandals and treat them leniently, people in that state or nation would not work hard to earn their livelihood and just scam people around for easy money. This would create a unstable society where no one would choose to live in.
Although, the reason of the claim states that the scandals help to put lights matters which are usually ignored by the people who are suposed to deal with them. This is somewhat true but by no means the ideal way to find and deal with those problems.
In conclusion, Scandals and frauds are unethical, cause a lot of distress to people in general and should not be claimed as useful to focus attention on problems i
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...round for easy money. This would create a unstable society where no one would cho...
^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...here no one would choose to live in. Although, the reason of the claim states that th...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 127, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...which are usually ignored by the people who are suposed to deal with them. This is some...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in general, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1780.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 376.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73404255319 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40348946061 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40688991406 2.79657885939 86% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.507978723404 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2722178344 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.25 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159138067587 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0618798138453 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668203073496 0.0758088955206 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112722148047 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462529087055 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.8420337079 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.