Leadership is one of the significant aspects which determine the fate of various arena in our society. Ranging from government, industry to a sports team, success is largely determined by the leadership factor. Thus, it has become increasingly important for us to make our youth realise how leadership is nontrivial and ineluctable for an enterprise or a government in order to function and flourish. It is generally thought that instilling a sense of cooperation rather than competition in young people is an effective way to prepare our youth to play the roles of our future leaders. I do agree with this perspective because it is cooperation which aims at overall improvement rather than satisfying individual needs.
Cooperation involves working together while bringing the best out of each other. This helps a lot because as humans we are not blessed with every kind of talent or quality. When we cooperate and work in a team, the team comprises of all the unique qualities possessed by each of the members. While competiting, we concentrate on ourselves. Even though people can train themselves in multifarious fields, one can never be expert or strong in every field of action. To ilustrate, I would give an example of a theatre group. Acting involves sundry facets. To be a part of theatre group, one might require to act, sing , dance or recite. If a group is formed with five people possessing unique talents, they would sure have an edge over an individual competitor. Thus, incultaing a sense of cooperation in youth can have several advatnages.
Admittedly, ideas generally do originate from an individual. But, if we really try to implement it on a larger scale, we would require cooperation from our friends, family or colleagues. For example, Mukesh Ambani probably had the idea of introducing such a low-priced JIO telecom company, but it is his associates, company marketing and employees who made it possible for it to make it really big in the market. Hence, cooperation is required for leadership. Competition alone cannot really take us far.
Nevertheless, competition is not a bad thing at all. In such a competitive world, one needs to prove his or her mettle in order to do better than his or her competitiors. And, if one fails to do so, they lag behind in the run for success. Also, while working in groups we coem across officious individuals, who try to pull us down instead of encouraging us. In such cases, competing individually obviously would seem tobe a better option.
In conclusion, despite of few negative aspect of cooperation, it still proves to be a better quality to be inculcated in our youth. Teaching cooperation sure has an upper hand over competition if we are really looking forward to make our youth realize the importance of leadership.
thanks for your essays
thanks for your essays
it helped me obtain a good score in awa
Cheers...
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r. This helps a lot because as humans we are not blessed with every kind of talen...
^^
Line 3, column 222, Rule ID: COMPRISES_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprises' or 'consists of'?
Suggestion: comprises; consists of
... cooperate and work in a team, the team comprises of all the unique qualities possessed by e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 604, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'acting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: acting
...art of theatre group, one might require to act, sing , dance or recite. If a group is ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 616, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...re group, one might require to act, sing , dance or recite. If a group is formed w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, nevertheless, really, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 41.0 33.0505617978 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99143468951 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99132096778 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558886509636 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1595662762 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3333333333 118.986275619 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2962962963 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03703703704 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117525147974 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0298776867179 0.0831039109588 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370564787699 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633231260203 0.150359130593 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0549361346331 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.