Cooperation may be defined as working together in a group while supporting each other constructively. Competition may be defined as trying to reach the pinnacle of glory while leaving others behind. Cooperation has a healthy undertone to it as compared to competition. To be an effective leader in any arena, an individual must have more of co-operative inclinations as compared to competitive ones. Hence, the young people should be instilled with a sense of cooperation and not competition.
Firstly, cooperation allows a group, team or organisation to pool in resources and work together. This allows for efficient utilization of resources. For example, a cooperative group comprising of different teams can use the same expensive workstation servers or auditoriums, thereby alleviating the need to duplicate resources; thereby reducing the financial implications. Had the teams in the group been competitive, sharing of resources would not have been possible.
Furthermore, when a cooperative group works in unison, a goodwill is established leading to more success. For example, if the developers and testers in a software organisation are cooperative, they will help each other resolve the issues in the software program rather than pinpointing each others' peccadilloes. This gives rise to a healthy working environment. Similarly, when the ruling and opposing parties in a government are cooperative, they work together towards the development of the nation. If they are competitive, they waste national resources and time playing petty politics.
Lastly, in a cooperative setup, young people are encouraged to be leaders and not bosses. Leaders work with the team while in a competitive setup, there are bosses. In such a setup, the team works for the boss. Leaders look after a unified success of the organisation along with its employees. Bosses only look at the increasing sales or monetary figures of the organisation with total disregard to the employees.
While some may argue that competition is necessary for success, it is a cynical thought. Competitive success is achieved at the cost of human values which does not prove beneficial in the long run. For example, a cooperative opposition party gives constructive feedback to the ruling party while in a competitive setup, the opposition party will try to find fault even in the positive steps taken by the government so that the former can achieve supremacy.
For a salubrious, sound and happy society, we need our young people to be cooperative and not competitive. A sense of cooperation is the key for developing future leaders who will build a well-balanced and healthy nation based on goodwill.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 184, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...urces. For example, a cooperative group comprising of different teams can use the same expens...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'work'?
Suggestion: work
... Furthermore, when a cooperative group works in unison, a goodwill is established le...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, lastly, look, may, similarly, so, still, well, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2262.0 2235.4752809 101% => OK
No of words: 421.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3729216152 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52971130743 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18563359581 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501187648456 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 727.2 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.287164709 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.25 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5416666667 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108146195111 0.243740707755 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0352827478333 0.0831039109588 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375980450787 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601634857313 0.150359130593 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248846882615 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.