The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
The author is spot on to recognize that cooperation is the most important factor in determining a leader's effectiveness. Leaders are not formed in a week, hence it makes perfect sense for the society to inculcate cooperative attributes to its young people. Leaders, by and large, have to make decisions based on the inputs from their team members and then relying on their own experience in different scenarios, whose outcomes over time would make or break a leader. The first step in making a decision requires that leaders have to communicate with their team members to collect information and it's necessary that they exhibit a sense of cooperation to get the information that they want from their team members. No one would be ready to converse with someone else who exhibits haughtiness(which could be a trait developed unconsciously because of a competitive mindset).
I have to talk about Dr. Satish Dawan here, an exuberant leader, who was the godfather of Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam, the missile man of India. Satish Dawan notably had exhibited other attributes of leadership including compassion, sanguinity, and level-mindedness which the following instance will make clear. Abdul Kalam had pressed a button to launch a satellite in unpropitious circumstances and Satish Dawan called out a press meet and announced it was his fault, rather than his team members. The next satellite launch was a success, and he let Abdul Kalam run the show in the respective press meet.
The quality of sanguinity, humbleness, and level-headedness are all by-products of a cooperative mindset instilled in Satish Dawan while he was young, I'm sure.
Thus a society should do all it can to instill a sense of cooperation among its young people in almost any field due to the benefits it offers to an individual as well as the society on the whole.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... most important factor in determining a leaders effectiveness. Leaders are not formed i...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: J
...eader, who was the godfather of Dr. A.P.J Abdul Kalam, the missile man of India. ...
^
Line 4, column 152, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...led in Satish Dawan while he was young, Im sure. Thus a society should do all ...
^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... Dawan while he was young, Im sure. Thus a society should do all it can to insti...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, still, then, thus, well, while, as well as, by and large, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 305.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02950819672 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01960627187 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583606557377 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5361535562 60.3974514979 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.454545455 118.986275619 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7272727273 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 5.21951772744 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129879229416 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0513580911965 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773859270986 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0905474483997 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072164342249 0.0667264976115 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.