We humans are social being. We live in a society and depend on each other for a better life. Our daily life goal is achieved through hard work and cooperation from other people. So, it's a great practice for a society to teach it's infants the sense of cooperation for their future endevors. On the other hand, the sense of competition might trigger them doing unethical works to achieve their goal.
First and foremost, learning cooperation helps a person to be a better and admired one in the society. Such people know the value of other person's priority and help them to do better. So, if a young person is taught the sense of cooperation he will end up being a great leader for the society. He will not be only good with his speech but also with his works. In every field he will help people and will get the same feedback, which will establish a healthy workplace. As an example, in Football, their is a better chance when a player passes the ball to one of his teammates rather than scoring by himself. Cooperation always brings positiveness in a person's mind and helps that person flourish in his field.
On the other side, when young people in a society are taught to be competitive they always crave for success and often end up being selfish and corrupt. They ignore the bigger happiness of mass people for their own glory. Competitive mind does not lay behind when it comes to a question of unethical work for achieving something. Such corrupted mind can not be an example of great leader or co-worker.
In contrast, for a quick developement people with competitive mind are necessary. They always think to improve and do better than the rest. They work hard for themselves and tries to bring success. then again success comes in better number when people work as a team, like building a space station is not an one man's job.
So, we can safely say that for a great leader or co-worker and for a healthy environment young people should have the sense of cooperation not competition.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 183, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
... and cooperation from other people. So, its a great practice for a society to teach...
^^^
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ty. Such people know the value of other persons priority and help them to do better. So...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 498, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... workplace. As an example, in Football, their is a better chance when a player passes...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Then
... themselves and tries to bring success. then again success comes in better number wh...
^^^^
Line 7, column 306, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...m, like building a space station is not an one mans job. So, we can safely say ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1648.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 356.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62921348315 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48731157048 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488764044944 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 500.4 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.11487318 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 78.4761904762 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9523809524 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.95238095238 5.21951772744 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257305171607 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812298490871 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771019450913 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164474555416 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621076247942 0.0667264976115 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 14.1392134831 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.38706741573 81% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 100.480337079 54% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.