The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Cooperation is defined as an act when people work together to achieve a common goal. On the other hand, competition is an act where individuals or group of individuals work to beat each other in achieving a goal. While cooperation seems to be a better option as it is more humanizing and based on the concept of working together, it would be parochial to believe that it is the ideal way forward.
Leadership as an attribute consists of elements like boldness, confidence, visionary personality and competitiveness. When we speak in terms of leadership in context of industries, a competitive leader would be the best person to provide direction to the organization. For example, we see that in the twenty first century there is growing competition in the automobile industry. Elon Musk, the founder of Tesla Motors is competing with other brands like Honda, to manufacture the cleaner and safer public vehicles. This competitive nature of the leader has benefited the society, as it makes companies come up with a better and more efficient solution. Similarily, competitive leadership in governance can be beneficial for the society. Young public servants compete amongst each other to make areas, which they govern more better (in terms of availability of government services, greviance addressal etc.) than others. This progressive competiton benefits the society at large. However, competition does not always lead to a positive change. It is well known how the textile industry expolits the workers in third world countries in order to capture their thin profit margins to remain competitive in market.
It is therefore necessary for the young people to have some sense of cooperation also. The role of leader is not limited to leading the organization but also taking people along with them. The leader must have the ability to work with other people to achieve this objective. For example, to the course of an organization would depend on leaders of various departments coming together and preparing a common annual action plan. Failure to work together and understand each other would ultimately lead to loss of the organization. Cooperation is hence a virtue that must be instilled in the young people.
To sum, while it is necessary for young people aiming for leadership positions to have a sense of cooperation instilled in them. Equal importance must be given to promote the sense of competition also. As it is an equal mix of cooperation and competition that would be the way forward for a better society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 302, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: twenty-first
...zation. For example, we see that in the twenty first century there is growing competition in...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 820, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... other to make areas, which they govern more better in terms of availability of government ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rgins to remain competitive in market. It is therefore necessary for the young ...
^^^
Line 5, column 82, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...eople to have some sense of cooperation also. The role of leader is not limited to l...
^^^^
Line 7, column 197, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...ven to promote the sense of competition also. As it is an equal mix of cooperation a...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'third', 'well', 'while', 'for example', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.252771618625 0.240241500013 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.152993348115 0.157235817809 97% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0909090909091 0.0880659088768 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0487804878049 0.0497285424764 98% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0310421286031 0.0444667217837 70% => OK
Prepositions: 0.126385809313 0.12292977631 103% => OK
Participles: 0.0376940133038 0.0406280797675 93% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.94817431503 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0465631929047 0.030933414821 151% => OK
Particles: 0.00221729490022 0.0016655270985 133% => OK
Determiners: 0.10421286031 0.0997080785238 105% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.019955654102 0.0249443105267 80% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0155210643016 0.0148568991511 104% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2525.0 2732.02544248 92% => OK
No of words: 413.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11380145278 6.0361032391 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375302663438 0.366273622748 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.283292978208 0.280924506359 101% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.208232445521 0.200843997647 104% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.167070217918 0.132149295362 126% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94817431503 2.79330140395 106% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 219.290929204 93% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493946731235 0.48968727796 101% => OK
Word variations: 54.395966672 55.4138127331 98% => OK
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6194690265 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.9565217391 23.380412469 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1536274778 59.4972553346 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.782608696 141.124799967 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9565217391 23.380412469 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.565217391304 0.674092028746 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 46.28581956 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.79047619048 1.64882698954 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.475362177248 0.391690518653 121% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.113804120933 0.123202303941 92% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0924236015104 0.077325440228 120% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.477626049016 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.166717338919 0.149214159877 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.170034695109 0.161403998019 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0898215462852 0.0892212321368 101% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.459273332079 0.385218514788 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0606121658336 0.0692045440612 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.344672308426 0.275328986314 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.072058538195 0.0653680567796 110% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.4325221239 163% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 14.0 7.22455752212 194% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 3.66592920354 27% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 4.0 2.70907079646 148% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.