The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
A leader is supposed to have virtues like confidence, an ability to think beyond the scope, a positive attitude towards the welfare of masses, taking into account the best interests of all. It is important for leaders to lead their teams by setting the right examples. These examples can be from a number of areas like morals, ethics, intelligence, smartness, ability to handle stress and generate positive outcomes from it etc. When a leader sets the right examples for his/her team, the team becomes motivated and works with positive energy towards the achievement of their goals.
We live in a society wherein people with common goals tend to work together for achieving them. When people are instilled with quality of cooperation then it will be a positive environment for people to work towards the greater good rather than keeping an eye on their own selfish motives. Although competition encourages people to put their best foot forward because they are only working for themselves at that point in time, however, a society that is driven by competition cannot be considered a healthy place to be a part of. It will be full of the air of negativity and jealousy. People who are driven by an urge to win in a competition often put down others to fulfil their selfish motives. This does not do well for the greater good.
Every sector around us is in a fast growing pace. In an environment of continuous enhancement, be it in any field, it does not do well for an individual to be driven by the sheer motive of competition. Rather, cooperation is the necessity of the hour for everyone to grow together. When organisations, institutions, firms, governments, industries take greater good of society into consideration then their energies, motives, plannings etc are only directed towards one direction o - the growth of all. They can provide their undivided attention towards one common objective. However, if the same institutions are only apprehensive about their personal selfish motives, then they will have to put in extra efforts in the form of their time, resources, plannings to be a part of the competition which involves bringing the competitor down. This way, the institutions will be unable to put their complete potential towards the ultimate goal.
It is necessary for a society to instil in its young people, an ability to live in cooperation and harmony. When such virtues are taught to the young minds from an early age itself, they can test their validity from an early age by practising them in a number of situations that they might face in their days to come. Children should be taught to help each other grow and not cut the roots of each other to be part of some competition that will only last for time being.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, still, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2278.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 468.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86752136752 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73167199818 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495726495726 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 720.0 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.9460352908 60.3974514979 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.9 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189532788788 0.243740707755 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.065770450003 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0621384966229 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122515998446 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574001707259 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.