The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Approaching the issue of leadership these days, we should make sure the lessons of history in this concern have been well taught. At a time when the clash of civilization was the predominant logic, which was shockingly in close proximity to the beginning of globalization, it turned out such a vision can have truly dire results. Today, from politics through labor force and into education, this question is still significantly relevant.
Conceding to the importance of prioritizing the united nature of humanity and the necessity of ccooperation that follows therefrom, it would still, however, be a false dichotomy to think of this as necessarily conflicting with competition. In fact, to absolutize the concept of competition as inevitably entailing of clash is a fallacy. Society can thrive with the two concepts working in poised harmony.
An example of the previous principle can be found in the concept of noble competition. By this, I mean any scope where a multitude of agents are keen on achieving a specified goal while showing tolerance to being outperformed and exhibiting respect for the moral code of the competition. This manifests as early as formal education, for instance, a period where the varying academic performance starts preparing students to adopt their attitude towards competition, hopefully with the aid of rational mentors.
Still, an emphasis on cooperation is urgently needed, for it is the mechanism by which the outcome of competition is ensured not to maintain a status-quo for the priviliged and exacerbate the plights of the less lucky. That is, it does not only help qualify leaders by benefitting from the collective capabilities of their peers, but also conveys the graces of the able to the rest of society.
To sum up, when taken to a radical extent, competition can prove, and has already proven, fairly risky. Yet, emphasizing on the moral code of noble competition and coupling it with celebrating the importance of cooperation, both for the advantaged and the disdvantaged, seems to be a preferred holistic approach to the nurture of tomorrow's leaders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: CLOSE_SCRUTINY[1]
Message: Use simply 'proximity'.
Suggestion: proximity
...dominant logic, which was shockingly in close proximity to the beginning of globalization, it t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, while, as for, for instance, i mean, in fact, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1773.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 339.0 442.535393258 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23008849558 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08132674895 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 215.323595506 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604719764012 0.4932671777 123% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3554007981 60.3974514979 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.384615385 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116687394739 0.243740707755 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366165465369 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419200988088 0.0758088955206 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0612672129304 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331119820743 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.38706741573 120% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.7820224719 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.