The best way for a society to prepare for its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition
Is cooperation is the best way to prepare a society of its young people for leadrshi in government, industry or other fields? I concede partially with the authors contentions. The speaker maintain too extreme of a position here which I believe to have a negative impact of the society. Both competition and co-operation is cardial in buidling the future generation and should be treated on case by case basis.
Firstly, the author have mentioned about two forms one is co-operation and another ins competition in building the best future through our young people. These polarized position in moulding a attribute of young people is far too harmful. Considering a sense of competition in every cases a person will face in life will have a detrimental effect for botht the individual and also for society. The quixotic scenario of winning all the competition in life also have abad impact in characteristics giving rise to ego, pride, and a tendency to be tyrranical. We all know, no country under any despot had a sustainable future, be it Adolf Hitler or current Sumpreme leader of North Korea. The loss self-confidence due to lost competition also lead to delerious effect on the mental health. This is not an expected scenario of having competition in everything and a person built under tremendous sens eof competition in everything will not be able to withstand the pressure meet the expectations from him as a leader.
Secondly, having instilled the sense of co-operation in a person all the time, might make one weak in terms of decision making where leader need to take harsh decision where one party might not get benefit. This will lead to his/her own pitfall and in the long run his sub-ordinate and his peers will loose confidence in him and the opposition will easily take control. The sense of co-operation all the time impair the quality of a stringent leader and surrounding people considers him as weak. Even the most successful co-operative leaders like Mahatma Gandhi or Martin King Luther Jr. took stand for their casue and despite being non-violent drew the fine line where they would never compromise.
Leaders need to be versatile. This one quality of diversity amke a leader different from others, though not everybody can stay tru to this quality butwe must prepare our young generation as the furture leader. In the process having the perfect sense of co-operation and competitiveness according to predicaments is the pivotal feature one must impute. A sense of competition all the time lead to war and a sense of co-operation all the time leads to lose. Neither is expected, so a leader must know how to strike a balance between two like that of Brack obama or jeff bezos, Jack ma.
In sum, It can be said that there is no generalized way in rendering todays young people since every circumstances are new and every person is unique so to bring the best of a person different approach need to be adapted to make one adept in leadership or any other field.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ins'' or 'in's'?
Suggestion: ins'; in's
...o forms one is co-operation and another ins competition in building the best future...
^^^
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e. These polarized position in moulding a attribute of young people is far too ha...
^
Line 3, column 464, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng all the competition in life also have abad impact in characteristics giving ri...
^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...run his sub-ordinate and his peers will loose confidence in him and the opposition wi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 24.0 12.9106741573 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2485.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 509.0 442.535393258 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88212180747 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.74984508646 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84803460282 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512770137525 0.4932671777 104% => OK
syllable_count: 805.5 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4439104942 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.333333333 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2380952381 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.7619047619 5.21951772744 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23181161523 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0720390484586 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.131360699324 0.0758088955206 173% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14117602826 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859505692438 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.36 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.