The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition.
The statement suggests that for optimum utilization of society's resources such as our youth, we need to instill them with a quality of cooperation instead of competition. I would like to agree with this statement and will be providing support for such claims in the following paragraphs.
Firstly, when we talk about the development of a society , we need to keep in mind that society in itself does not mean wellbeing of each individual but rather the entire group as a whole. If we start implementing rules and regulations according to each individual, then the society as a whole fails and we will see a rapid decline in stability. But instead, if we cooperate and then take decisions, which leads to stability in society as a whole, then there is a higher rate of success. As the famous quote goes 'In unity we stand and divided we fall'. If young individuals start competing instead of cooperating, then regular negative trysts would lead to chaos and destruction instead of order and development.
Additionally, I would like to bring to light the fact that the young generation is the future of the nation. Every step they take towards their futures, is a step towards the future of the nation. So we need to make sure that instilling their minds with the correct formula for success because that is our best bet for the development of a great nation. By cooperating, we teach them that taking in every opinion and perspective and then taking decisions accordingly, creates rooms for innovation and better reforms that will burgeon our upcoming generations for decades. For instance, a person who takes in opinions of their peers is more likely to be respected and valued than a person who just wishes to beat his peers and come out first. No one wants to listen to this person. So the recipe for development is definitely joining hands and going forward.
Parallelly, the proponents of this argument would mention that competition between peers motivates everyone to do their best. I would like to agree with this statement but only till a certain extent. Competition does bring out the best in people and is surely a motivating factor. But if there has to be any kind of competition, it has to be with our own selves; to be better than we were the last time. To beat our own limits and come out the best versions of ourselves. Each individual is born with different capabilities and pitting them against each other and thinking that would benefit the nation is disaster in process and would be a erroneous decision to take.
In essence, I would just like to say that taking decisions regarding the youth of the country has to be thoroughly thought of and every aspect of such decisions should be looked properly. Significant decisions like these could make or break a country and then we would have no one to blame. So we should be very careful and discuss these things with cooperation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 57, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... talk about the development of a society , we need to keep in mind that society in...
^^
Line 7, column 640, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ion is disaster in process and would be a erroneous decision to take. In essen...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, if, look, regarding, so, still, then, well, as to, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 33.0505617978 151% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2402.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 503.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77534791252 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73578520332 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70888200152 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 244.0 215.323595506 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485089463221 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 744.3 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2487993194 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.434782609 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8695652174 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154676928396 0.243740707755 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478065935148 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517868384577 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.08965759225 0.150359130593 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0594449858352 0.0667264976115 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.