Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks
The author of the argument states that men and women are not equally suited for many tasks due to their inherent physical differences. I'd like to disagree with the statement to some extent. Of course, scientifically proven, men and women have many physiological differences but the author's statement is pretty limiting to a certain extent.
Firstly, I'd like to question the author what kind of tasks is he referring to here? Are they manual tasks? Or are they cerebral tasks? The vagueness of the author makes it difficult to understand his point of view. If the author refers to manual tasks, I will agree with him since men and women are built differently. Scientifically prove, men have more strength in their muscles to carry out cumbersome task that put a lot of strain on the body. On the other hand if the author is referring to cerebral tasks, i.e, tasks requiring intelligence, he/she goes a little extreme delivering such a statement. They are many jobs that men and women fight for equally today and are also excelling respectively. For example, the responsibility of cooking and all the things that happen in the kitchen has been a job that has been for ages always assigned to women. It has always been assumed that women are better at such chores. But today, men are doing an equally excellent duty at handling the kitchen and cooking various cuisines.
Additionally, the question also arises whether the tasks being referred to here are limited to a specific gender. A gig requiring a model who is female can't employ a man because he is not suited for it and doesn't pass the requirements. Similarly, a job that requires the strength of the man, for example, to move huge bricks that are too large to goes beyond the capability of women lifting it, will not be able to employ women because of the insufficient requirements. The author fails to mention the specificity of the tasks. Simply not meeting the requirements doesn't mean not being capable or suited for such tasks.
Parallelly, the proponents of this argument would mention how there are jobs like mowing the lawn and plumbing and other similar tasks that are done by men and would not be suited for a woman to handle. I would like to agree with them but only for the first part. It is not that women are not suited for the task but rather, it might be difficult for them to do it. It doesn't go out to say that there are no women who can do it. We find various day to day examples where a job perfectly deemed for a man to be carried out is now being handled by a woman, and that too very perfectly.
In essence, men and women do have inherent physical differences, but we can't put out a statement without understanding it fully or describing the technicalities of it. There are tasks that men do better and there other tasks that women do better, but it doesn't say that it is impossible for either one of them to do the other one's job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...to their inherent physical differences. Id like to disagree with the statement to ...
^^
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
... many physiological differences but the authors statement is pretty limiting to a certa...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...iting to a certain extent. Firstly, Id like to question the author what kind o...
^^
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
.... A gig requiring a model who is female cant employ a man because he is not suited f...
^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...man because he is not suited for it and doesnt pass the requirements. Similarly, a job...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ks. Simply not meeting the requirements doesnt mean not being capable or suited for su...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 370, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ight be difficult for them to do it. It doesnt go out to say that there are no women w...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 73, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...e inherent physical differences, but we cant put out a statement without understandi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 255, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ther tasks that women do better, but it doesnt say that it is impossible for either on...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, similarly, so, for example, kind of, of course, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 33.0 19.5258426966 169% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2400.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59770114943 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62253469591 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.432950191571 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2597515618 60.3974514979 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3076923077 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.427982584873 0.243740707755 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114545553075 0.0831039109588 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117730438358 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249068616736 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10059161414 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 48.8420337079 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 12.1639044944 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.38706741573 88% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.