The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment

Essay topics:

The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.

How do you measure a musician's real talent? The argument mentions assessing musician's talent to pass out an honest assessment to his qualities. But can you really tell if someone's music is right or wrong? Is it right comparing it with other subjective fields such as Mathematics? I would like to disagree with the argument here and provide a few of my opinions on this.

Firstly, the author mentions here that a musician's death can only be her/his way to getting honest assessment of her/his music. We have excelled so much over the past centuries only to accurately be able to assess music after a grave event like someone's death? All the fame that the author mentions here that stymies with the musician's real assessment of her/his music, is very subjective. Music is not a field that has a right or wrong. Music is meant to be enjoyed. It is meant to be devoured by anyone and everyone who like it. A musician's motive isn't to just keep collecting audience for no reason. It is also to make an impact through his own music. That fame could be the real assessment of the musician. Maybe a musician is popular and famous because her/his music is that poignant. Disregarding fame as a hindrance to assessing someone's talent is not fair to the musician's fans and the musician himself.

Parallelly, the entire motive of a musician is to appeal to an audience no matter the size. If a musician isn't dead but isn't famous either doesn't mean his music is any less good compared to others. He just maybe hasn't been discovered by a people yet. Or hasn't gotten a chance to send her/his music out to the world yet. Subsequently, even if a small amount of people like his music, he's already successful. His motive is in progress. Just because someone else could do it better (gather a lot of audience), doesn't mean his worth is diminished.

Lastly, if you assess a musician's worth only after his death, he/she will never be able to know if they were ever good. They will spend their entire life maybe waiting for that validation and upon not getting them, might even go to great extents of giving up their music careers. This decision could stop a great musician for developing fully and that's robbing the society of an idol. A musician's gets encouragement when they get an audience validation or most importantly, music authority's validation. This validation could either make them or break them. Passing out decisions such as the topic itself could be grave decision and would do a lot of damage.

In contrast, there are also celebrities that have a lot of fame and just because they might look good or have a beautiful personality doesn’t mean that their talent/music is the real deal. All this could be because of the fame the author of the argument mentions. She/he could be getting undue publicity for no reason, which in turn foreshadows other actually good musicians. But this scenario happens one in a million. Audience isn't that much of a fool to neglect real musicians for fake ones. We've got to give more credit to the assessment abilities of the audience as well as the music authority.

In conclusion, I'd just like to mention that while the author of the argument might not be completely wrong, it doesn't make his argument any less ridiculous. Judging abilities and talents after death of a musician is depriving him/her of an opportunity to grow and to become better. This decision could do more harm than good and we all would be facing it's consequences.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: a musician; musicians
How do you measure a musicians real talent? The argument mentions asse...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 42, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'musicians'' or 'musician's'?
Suggestion: musicians'; musician's
...irstly, the author mentions here that a musicians death can only be her/his way to gettin...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'someones'' or 'someone's'?
Suggestion: someones'; someone's
...o assess music after a grave event like someones death? All the fame that the author men...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...veryone who like it. A musicians motive isnt to just keep collecting audience for no...
^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ience no matter the size. If a musician isnt dead but isnt famous either doesnt mean...
^^^^
Line 5, column 121, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...r the size. If a musician isnt dead but isnt famous either doesnt mean his music is ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...sician isnt dead but isnt famous either doesnt mean his music is any less good compare...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
... good compared to others. He just maybe hasnt been discovered by a people yet. Or has...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: hasn't
...snt been discovered by a people yet. Or hasnt gotten a chance to send her/his music o...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 384, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: he's
... small amount of people like his music, hes already successful. His motive is in pr...
^^^
Line 5, column 487, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun audience seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of audiences'.
Suggestion: a lot of audiences
... someone else could do it better gather a lot of audience, doesnt mean his worth is diminished. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 506, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... do it better gather a lot of audience, doesnt mean his worth is diminished. Lastl...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 348, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...great musician for developing fully and thats robbing the society of an idol. A music...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 386, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A musician' or simply 'musicians'?
Suggestion: A musician; Musicians
...d thats robbing the society of an idol. A musicians gets encouragement when they get an aud...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 398, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'get'.
Suggestion: get
...ing the society of an idol. A musicians gets encouragement when they get an audience...
^^^^
Line 9, column 430, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ario happens one in a million. Audience isnt that much of a fool to neglect real mus...
^^^^
Line 9, column 496, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: We've
...o neglect real musicians for fake ones. Weve got to give more credit to the assessme...
^^^^
Line 11, column 16, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...the music authority. In conclusion, Id just like to mention that while the aut...
^^
Line 11, column 112, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ument might not be completely wrong, it doesnt make his argument any less ridiculous. ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, if, lastly, look, may, really, regarding, so, well, while, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 69.0 33.0505617978 209% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2868.0 2235.4752809 128% => OK
No of words: 608.0 442.535393258 137% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71710526316 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9656475924 4.55969084622 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59367229884 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.444078947368 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 900.0 704.065955056 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 38.0 20.2370786517 188% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.9991390182 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.4736842105 118.986275619 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.76315789474 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 19.0 7.80617977528 243% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 20.0 10.2758426966 195% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345899974037 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0940853243664 0.0831039109588 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0958370015668 0.0758088955206 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188800704768 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105672226714 0.0667264976115 158% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 14.1392134831 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 12.1639044944 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.