Environment is an important part of our life. It is our duty to keep the surrounding clean in order to stay healthy as polluting it is detrimental for our health. However, I do not agree with the author that only way to keep the environmental problems at bay is to place restrictions on the amount of wastes trashed by each household there are certain reasons to it which I would like discuss in the following essay.
First and foremost, it is not easy to check and control the amount of wastes dumped by the households. People will find another way to dump the trash if strict limits are imposed. For example, they will throw the garbage in the public places like parks and this in turn will increase the problem of pollution rather than solving it. Moreover, the government will face one more challange to overcome. Thus, it can be said that imposing limits on the trash disposal is not going to help in keeping the surrounding clean and pollution free.
Besides this, I believe that turning the household trash into something useful can reduce the environmental problems. For example, using food wastes as manure by composting it. This in turn may encourage to lessen the use of chemical manure used in the agriculture as it is freely available. Additionally, the household wastes can also be use to generate electricity. Thus, saving non-renewable energy resources such as coal which is used in large amount for the electricity generation and is depleting very fast and it may prove pollution free way to produce electricity. Therefore, solving two problems at the same time.
Thus, it can be said that restrictions to the household wastes may solve the problem related to environment, but it can not be considered as long term goal. The environmental problems can be solved by taking measures as discussed above by using the wastes and turning it into something advantageous for both the environment and people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 385, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...certain reasons to it which I would like discuss in the following essay. Firs...
^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lessening'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: lessening
...mposting it. This in turn may encourage to lessen the use of chemical manure used in the ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: BE_USE_TO_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...nally, the household wastes can also be use to generate electricity. Thus, saving n...
^^^
Line 5, column 340, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...nally, the household wastes can also be use to generate electricity. Thus, saving n...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1599.0 2235.4752809 72% => OK
No of words: 327.0 442.535393258 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88990825688 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81919704037 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.516819571865 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.407228149 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9375 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306993053162 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955039291397 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058665930256 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181753300491 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043642558968 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.