The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Towns and cities imposing strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household, is definitely an effective way of curbing the amount of consumer-generated waste, but is it the best way? Let's see in the subsequent arguments.
World population is on a outburst. With the increase in the number of people, the number of households also increase, resulting in an increase in the amount of consumer generated waste. If the local goverment bodies of towns/cities impose a restriction on the amount of trash they will collect from each household, it will enforce the people to keep a check on the amount of waste they are being generating on per houshold basis. That means, every individual despite of making sure his indivdual contribution in the generated waste, would also need to ensure that the amount of waste generated by the other family members is well within the limits imposed. This way, the amount of waste being generated would reduce by a significant amount. Thus, the initiative is surely helping in the cause of decreasing the consumer generated waste.
Apart from this, the governement bodies can also organize some waste management programs in different localities, so as to help the households on how they can effectively reduce and manage the amount of generated waste. The programs can give special emphasis on using utensils instead of paper plates and using biodegradable paper bags instead of plastic bags. The local goverment bodies should also play a complementary role in this initiative, to make it even more effective. They should come up with measures on improving the overall waste disposal system of the city or town. Even if the check is imposed, the cummulative amount of waste which gets generated in a city, is huge, and a proper disposal strategy will only add to the initiative.
However, on can argue that even if there is a limit on the amount of waste per household, people can take undue advantages and can find loopholes in the implementation strategy. They can secretly dump their excessive waste to some other far off location, and it will in turn, fail the purpose. Also, it is arguable that the housholds are the only main contributor in the consumer generated waste. There must be similar checks for the dining places and malls, which witness a great number of foot fall on a daily basis. Also, the proposed strategy is only useful for developed countries like United States of America, where the waste gets collected from household to household. In developing countires like India, where there is no such system, and it is left on the houshold's end to dispose their waste on the nearby collection site, this strategy cannot be deemed as the best.
In the end, though the check proposed by the local goverment bodies, on the amount of waste which would be acceptable from each household, is effective and useful in decreasing the amount of consumer gernerated waste but it is certainly not the best way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 208, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...enerated waste, but is it the best way? Lets see in the subsequent arguments. World...
^^^^
Line 2, column 24, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...uent arguments. World population is on a outburst. With the increase in the numb...
^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ement programs in different localities, so as to help the households on how they can eff...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, thus, well, apart from, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2471.0 2235.4752809 111% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93213572854 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71468826798 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463073852295 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 799.2 704.065955056 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.557893187 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.55 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.05 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346516130964 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107899797413 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107665281916 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24425031163 0.150359130593 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0951513996863 0.0667264976115 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.