A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The world has a vast variety of fields to study. Given the vast diversity of different fields, there should not be a nation wide similar curriculum for all the students until they enter college.
Let's take a high level example. If a student wants to pursue Business Administration and if the nation wide common curriculum consists of subjects like Geography, Physics, Chemistry and Biology, there would be no use to make that student to learn all of these subjects. On the other hand, if his basics are reinforced right from the school level in the subjects of his interest, that would help him to master the advanced level of concepts which he would learn in college.
The world level competitveness is growing day-by-day. Most of the innovative companies try to hire the best in the field. If a nation wants to produce quality work population, it should have well-rounded liberal policies where students should be allowed to study only the subjects of their interest right after their senior secondary level, at least after their matriculation. This would help them to focus on their respective areas and would ultimately help them to nurture their foundations. This way, they would stand out of the rest of their counterparts in other countries, where education policies are not that liberal.
In addition to this, the liberal education policies can also help to decrease the cummulative number of school dropouts in a country. For an instance, a student wants to pursue medicine after his school. He is exceptionally good in Biology but the common curriculum wants him to score well in the subjects like History and Mathematics, as well. Unfortunately, if he is not good in these subjects and he couldn't get through the final exams, he might choose to drop out. And thus, depriving the world of one additional exceptional doctor. Had he been in a nation, where he was supposed to be good only in Biology to enter into a med school, he would not get disheartened and left his studies.
However, one can simply argue on the fact that a well rounded personality is only possible when a student is taught all the subjects in totality, at least up to a certain level of his formal education. This certainly cannot be ignored but there is a difference between imposing something and making it as an optional choice. There should be a certain level of liberty where a student should be given ample time to focus on the subjects of his interest, rest all the subjects can be taught but they should not be put as a definite requirement.
Culminating in the end, though it is essential to expose a student with numerous fields, but it should not be made compulsory to master them all. The curriculum should be decided as per the affinity of individual student, based on his interests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: NATION_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nationwide'?
Suggestion: nationwide
...different fields, there should not be a nation wide similar curriculum for all the students...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...e students until they enter college. Lets take a high level example. If a student...
^^^^
Line 3, column 97, Rule ID: NATION_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nationwide'?
Suggestion: nationwide
...rsue Business Administration and if the nation wide common curriculum consists of subjects ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: USE_TO_VERB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
...hemistry and Biology, there would be no use to make that student to learn all of th...
^^^
Line 7, column 404, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...he is not good in these subjects and he couldnt get through the final exams, he might c...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, thus, well, at least, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2316.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84518828452 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74415111915 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.464435146444 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 717.3 704.065955056 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1311245994 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.285714286 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7619047619 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.19047619048 5.21951772744 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225238925778 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649336691987 0.0831039109588 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0986349313125 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1465314132 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0962221823093 0.0667264976115 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.96 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.