The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The issue at hand tries to solve environmental problems created by wastes from consumers by imposing strict rules on the amount of waste that a household can dump. Given such laws can limit the quantity of waste being generated it is the best way to fight increasing environmental connundrums.
This plan, although curbs the quantity of waste being generated, doesnot check the quality of wate. The biggest threat to environment is plastic and large amounts of this non-recyclable material is being dumped every day. For instance, Delhi, the capital of India, has been reported to have discared 1.7 million plastic bottles. People can control the amount of waste being thrown away, but can keep using plastic bottles and cause the same, if not more, harm to the environment. Although the plan at hand doesnot restrict the materials that can be accepted, imposing a limit on the amount of trash will force the residents to use permanent utensils like a ceramic mug instead of a plastic bottle or a small purse or a bag replacing small plastic pouches.
Restricting the quantity of wastes being accepted by the municipality will make residents of a town or city think wisely about their habits that leads to creation of wastes start curbing excess waste which will inturn limit environmental pressure to some extent. For example, supermarkets throwing away fruits and vegetables that perish will now have to think about limiting their stocks to reasonable amounts. Knowing that there are millions of starving people in this world, instead of throwing away excess food, people can donate their excess to various charitable organisations or homeless people. For instance, in a province in Canada around 1000 kids face diseases becasue of malnutrition, while 1300 kilograms of food is wasted every month. The government came up with a plan to fine supermarkets that threw excess food while reward them if they donated to charity. The plan reduced wastage by almost 61% as reported last year. Therefore, such limits work in favour of saving the environment.
In conclusion, a method like imposing strict limits on the amount of waste that every household can throw away is agreeably the best way to solve environmental pressure. Such laws increases awareness about the environment and create a sense of responsibility among the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'increase'.
Suggestion: increase
...solve environmental pressure. Such laws increases awareness about the environment and cre...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1958.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 381.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13910761155 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41805628031 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73433881057 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54593175853 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.8715914223 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.375 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8125 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4375 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271912558013 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083161451211 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0847523368948 0.0758088955206 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182790844087 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704806535995 0.0667264976115 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.