Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
The statement claims that people holding positions of authority in different fields like business, politics or government should handover their power to others after five years to rejuvinate the enterprise, hence leading to sure success. However, in my opinion five years is too small of a timespan to plan and execute a proper mission statement and therefore the statement is absolutely unjustified.
A new leader brings with himself a fresh perspective to the enterprise and is often excited to put his ideas into action soon. His leadership style can be completely different than others and with introduction of policies can bolster working attitudes in employees which is essential for the success of any institution. For example, with Steve Balmer becoming the new CEO of Microsoft in 2009, he changed the perspective of the organization from a product-driven to a service-oriented company. This brought an enthusiasm among the employees and Microsoft started doing well in their business. However, the lack of experience in Steve made him do certain critical mistakes that affected Microsoft's stocks negatively. Seeking to change the leadership style in 2011, Satya Nadella took over Steve and made things even worse till 2015. It has been only 2 years that Microsoft's stocks have reached all time high and telling Nadella to step down since he has been holding the power for more than 5 years is
not a fair idea.
It takes some amount of time to plan and start executing new policies that will gear any institution towards a common goal. 5 years is not a sufficient mark to fulfill a plan and find out it's results. Every big organization works on a system of feedbacks. With every plan in force, extensive feedback is taken to understand the effect of it. It takes considerable time to understand from the flaws and reiterate the solution, even change the approach to a problem completely. The biggest example is the Head of Department of any big university in a country. He needs to understand and plan accordingly how the department is going to work and after extensive feedback from the students performance, he can devise an effective structure to his solution. 5 years won't give enough time for an person in power to develop on big ideas that might change the future of the organization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 177, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...rship style can be completely different than others and with introduction of policie...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1001, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lding the power for more than 5 years is not a fair idea. It takes some amount...
^^^
Line 6, column 677, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...k and after extensive feedback from the students performance, he can devise an effective...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 787, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tion. 5 years wont give enough time for an person in power to develop on big ideas...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1924.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 384.0 442.535393258 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01041666667 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4267276788 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89391704431 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549479166667 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 602.1 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2588177933 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.176470588 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5882352941 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05882352941 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173244513042 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455988785565 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504763431531 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1139294441 0.150359130593 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.035855888374 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.