Claim: In any field — business, politics, education, government — those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
The statement maintains that the boss or the first person of the organization should change after five years because it assures the success of the organizations. I could not be agree with this statement as it is, since the statement mentions this process should happen in any fields and it is the best way. While it could be a good process, but it should not generalize for all fields and it may some other ways that works better than this method.
The claim says that in any field ranging from politics and business to education and government all the bosses should change after 5 years. Although changing the first power of the organization due to reduction corruption and presenting new ideas to the organization looks reliable, it could not apply for all of the organizations. For example, in a research institute which investigation may take more than ten years to achieve results could be a disaster. It may change the process of the research to another way that are adjusted to the view of the new boss.
In the reason statement, it mentions that it is the best way that could support the success of the organization while it is possible to find another way that works better than this suggestion. For instance, some may recommend to add new consultant to the organization to help the manager and bring new ideas. The manager could pursue these ideas to promote the company and due to the experiences that the boss has and understanding the limitation of the organization, he could elect the best suggestion and assure the success of the organization.
Although the claim and the reason have some defects which I have mentioned above, it could be good suggestion if the defects could be removed. Changing the manager of an organization could have several advantages. First, it could reduce the corruption in the organization because after some years the boss could find different ways to take advantage of the organization and by changing him or her this path would be closed. Another advantage is that new manager could bring new ideas and energy to the organization which could force it to evolve and lead to success for the organization.
In conclusion, though the claim and the reason have some defects such as generalization for all of the fields and allegation that it is the best way, if the aforementioned issues could be solved the suggestion might be reliable. Because it could eliminate the corruption and bring new ideas and energy to the organization.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 307, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... looks reliable, it could not apply for all of the organizations. For example, in a resear...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 217, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend adding'.
Suggestion: recommend adding
...this suggestion. For instance, some may recommend to add new consultant to the organization to h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...some defects such as generalization for all of the fields and allegation that it is the be...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, look, may, so, while, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 26.0 12.4196629213 209% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 32.0 12.9106741573 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 2235.4752809 92% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86997635934 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83694641371 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 215.323595506 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.38061465721 0.4932671777 77% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5892959809 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.75 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4375 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149363087865 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641900284345 0.0831039109588 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481959766247 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101323173975 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354038489712 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.