Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the ext

Essay topics:

Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.

Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.

Leadership is the quality of a person to lead a group of people, institution, or the whole country. I believe the energy and enthusiasm of young people must be utilized by revitalizing through new leadership. However, the condition differs according to the field, some fields may recquire more than five years to obtain the objective so revitalization is important but strict five years duration for every field is objectionable.

New leadership is always wanted in an institute to work on the new objectives with new enthusiasm than the old one. As an example the newly elected prime minister in Finland is a young woman of 35 years of age. She being elected as a great post in the country is obviously for her great alacrity of leading the country new direction and achieving more than the old leadership. So, the rejuvenation of the leadership is important.

However, in an educational institute, If a leader can not achieve in objectives in five years period, then he or her leadership is sure to be more mundane afterwards. New enthusiasm of new coming leader will obviously lead the educational institute effectively.

In Politics, however, if a leader works for five years only and stepped down, the experience gained by the leader during his or her tenure can not be utilized afterwards. So instead of complete stepping down from the politics, the experienced leader must be working as a consultant to share his experiences, though being not in power. Also, five year is very short time in politics.

In sum, every field requires experienced but young and enthusiastic leadership in power to lead the organization effectively. Hence, the revitalization of the leadership is essential but five yeas duration is not strictly applicable in every field and experienced leaders must work as a consultant, even after stepping down from the active power.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s with new enthusiasm than the old one. As an example the newly elected prime mini...
^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'She' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...s a young woman of 35 years of age. She being elected as a great post in the country ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 30, Rule ID: NEEDS_FIXED[1]
Message: "requires experienced" is only accepted in certain dialects. For something more widely acceptable, try 'experiencing' or 'to be experienced'.
Suggestion: experiencing; to be experienced
...olitics. In sum, every field requires experienced but young and enthusiastic leadership i...
^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, so, then, thus

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.3162921348 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 2235.4752809 70% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07166123779 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04134070979 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485342019544 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 704.065955056 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5403634924 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.214285714 118.986275619 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9285714286 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196661071556 0.243740707755 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749101369979 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409565237087 0.0758088955206 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118990130217 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407569147631 0.0667264976115 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.