The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The writer proposes for reducing the environmental problems which are caused by consumer-generated waste, there should be laws legislated in order to limit the amount of trash which is accepted from each household. In my point of view, I don’t believe that this action would be a conducive action due to the the following reasons.
First of all, limiting the amount of trash accepted from each household doesn’t necessarily reduce the consumption. People will keep buying their demanded products and by establishing this limitation, they might leave their trash somewhere else which might be even more problematic for the environment. For instance, there have been evidence about people who put their trash at their neighbor’s trash can to get rid of the bad smell of the trash. Imagine by stricter laws and penalties, myriads of people will just dispose their trash anywhere else even in the nature.
On the other hand, the best way to mitigate the environmental pollutions is to establish a culture which all people learn to separate their wet and dry waste which can improve the efficiency of the recycling process. For example, the government can enact laws to charge household who don’t separate their recycling and non recycling waste and this action will eventually lead to a lower amount of the production of mixed waste.
In Addition, the government can assist to reduce the pollution significantly by investing money on producing biodegradable materials such as paper straws and containers. The government can allocate grants for research companies and universities to produce degradable products. Besides producing degradable products, finding new ways to recycle all types of waste can lessen the environmental problems considerably. Taking papers as an instance, recycling the papers will not only stymie cutting the trees, it will also reduce the amount of paper garbage found in the nature. There has been also research done about how to use plastic to recycle it to clothing materials by which all the plastic materials can be reutilized for new purposes.
In Conclusion, putting limits on the trash accepted from the households will not ameliorate environmental problems. For the best impact, the best way is encouraging the citizens to separate their waste and investing on the production of biodegradable materials.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...tion would be a conducive action due to the the following reasons. First of all, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...tion would be a conducive action due to the the following reasons. First of all, ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, if, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2006.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 372.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39247311828 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00399948263 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 613.8 704.065955056 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6487228821 60.3974514979 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.733333333 118.986275619 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 5.21951772744 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287684476108 0.243740707755 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108635121675 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984590266446 0.0758088955206 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186172533836 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662206140561 0.0667264976115 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.