the fact that professionals in a certain field have more knowledge in handling aspects related to their profession rather than other people is undisputable. However, a person working in a specific place is more aware about the pons and cons of that environment.
the fact that professionals in a certain field have more knowledge in handling aspects related to their profession rather than other people is undisputable. However, a person working in a specific place is more aware about the pons and cons of that environment. As a result, the wisest way to imrove the operations of a company is utilizing the opinions of their own empoyees.
Giving responsibilities to workers of a business has always proven to show auspicious outcomes. If everyone takes small duties in the workplace they do their best to perform and bring the wanted results. On the contrary, consultants hired from outside are responsible for the whole organization and they will not pay attention to small details of the company. On the other hand, hiring consultants for each part of the business will be much less cost efficient comparing a single person. By giving bonus to workers showing the best result, the company will gain much more benefits due to the passion of the workers. for example, in some factories in europe, workers who find a better way for the machine operations are awarded a generous amount of money and as a result, the company can save more money on energy and other needed materials.
Routins make individuals more accustomed with an operation. Someone who does something hounder times a day, knows better how it works. There might be minuscule details which are hidden from eyes of every consultant and even the company owners. Some flaws seem minimum while in fact, are harmful for the success of the business. Employees can prevent these detrimental effects by consulting the business owners to find the best alternatives in order to nullify them.
It is always the best idea to consult the workers before doing any other movements. By asking them, they can prevent paying the extra money to consultant if they can help the business augmenting their income. There might be much feasible ways which were just hidden from the owners to develop a company. thats why its always better to consult people who know the place rather than spending money on educating people who might not even help the succeed of the company.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the fact that professionals in a certain fi...
^^^
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ing the opinions of their own empoyees. Giving responsibilities to workers of a ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 617, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: For
...fits due to the passion of the workers. for example, in some factories in europe, w...
^^^
Line 5, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... alternatives in order to nullify them. It is always the best idea to consult th...
^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thats
...n from the owners to develop a company. thats why its always better to consult people...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 305, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: that's
...n from the owners to develop a company. thats why its always better to consult people...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 441, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ducating people who might not even help the succeed of the company.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for example, in fact, as a result, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1797.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93681318681 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61398752971 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532967032967 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0295531604 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8333333333 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.21951772744 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.13820224719 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26932063373 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0897416086483 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179150393457 0.0758088955206 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228588627793 0.150359130593 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.292920349024 0.0667264976115 439% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.