As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to
think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
The speaker asserts that the more people rely on technology, the more the thinking ability of humans will decrease. In general, I refute this statement because the indisputable fact that technology depends on humans thinking for its initiation and progress. To begin with, the first place that the seed of all technology ideas are planted is the human brain. Without the human brain, no advances in technology would be possible. By the brainpower, people can fulfil their goals in technology and utilize their ideas to progress. By time, current advances wont be enough to satisfy the needs of the society and they will need to develop technological findings which is only possible by thinking. Taking cars as an instance, in order to make a car much more efficient many thoughts have to be involved. Technology can never help finding new designs for the car and is not able to apply the needs of the society on the car and design new methods in order to make it more efficient. In addition, technology has a telling role in decreasing the time of performance of some daily tasks. By the help of technology, many tasks of life can be performed in a fraction of time compared to the past when much more time was needed in order to perform the most simple tasks. For example, calculators mitigated the most dilatory calculatons which took hours to be done in seconds. This can help people spending less time on actions which are considered basic now and use their brains to develop new means in technology and discern additional needs in the society in order to solve these problems. The fact that technology will reduce the amount of thought used on some tasks is irrefutable, however, it will never stymie individuals to pursue new accomplishments in technology fields. The more technology advances, the more complicated it will be to handle it and more calculations and logic will be needed in order to solve the problems. For instance, older computers were much easier to repair comparing to new computers which have much more details which is due to the more convoluted system and more aspects should be consideret which consequently need more thinking. In Conclusion, I am a firm believer that technology is not reducing the brain power, in reality, it it conducive to the augment of the brain strenght and it can only develop by the means of brainpower.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 828, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[5]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to find' or 'find'.
Suggestion: to find; find
... be involved. Technology can never help finding new designs for the car and is not able...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2255, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: it
...t reducing the brain power, in reality, it it conducive to the augment of the brain s...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 2274, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...n power, in reality, it it conducive to the augment of the brain strenght and it can only d...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, so, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in general, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83910891089 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72980527322 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465346534653 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 621.9 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4538838637 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.1875 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.3125 5.21951772744 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.334651844852 0.243740707755 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118419620413 0.0831039109588 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107379126357 0.0758088955206 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.334651844852 0.150359130593 223% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.