A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
According to the statement, all the students of a nation require the same studying curriculum before entering college. Besides the virtue of giving all the students of a country the same educational facilities, this idea fails to be practical due to the differences the government has to consider before establishing regulations for the nation's educational system and therefore it can be refuted because of the following reasons. First of all, establishing a school curriculum which will satsify all the people demands high investments which as a consequence increases the tuiton. The budget of attending the same program has to be affordable by all the involved students. There are regions with people suffering from extreme poverty who not only won't be able to manage the cost of the attendance, but will also quit school as a consequence of the high expenses. However a similar educational system will provide similar oppurtunities for all the scholar to pursue their goals, they have to have the same foundations to make the best of these opportunities. The educational system has to take into account all the different regions in a country. The needs of a specific area might differ from another one. Taking future occupations for instance, there are regions which agriculture has to be in priority opposed to regions which cannot utilize agriculture and farming in their areas and need more engineers due to the industrial demands of the area. School courses in each area have to be in harmony with the needs of the area and taking additional courses will therefore waste a considerable amount of the time of the students and prohibit them to strengthen the needs of their partical neighborhood. In addition to budget and the demands in pecific regions, different levels of intelligence among students or disabillities of some children have to be taken into considerations. Not everyone can advance simillary in specific fields and by not showing the desired outcome, and especially being compared with other scholars, the idea of the same curicullim will have detrimental pscychologic impacts on the student and they won't show progress in their efforts and quit school to avoid the hardness of attending school. In Conclusion, i profoundly believe that the government should consider different needs of diverse type of students with different backgrounds and abillities. By focusing on the regional needs they can have a great impact on the economical growth of the area as well as the economy. Considering different courses for less intelligent students which will create a happy experience for them besides making them believe about their values as well as considering the budget of some cities will prevent student to exit school and make them prepared to pusue their future goals.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 864, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... as a consequence of the high expenses. However a similar educational system will provi...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 2449, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...eds they can have a great impact on the economical growth of the area as well as the econo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2340.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 452.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17699115044 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61088837703 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90781701563 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469026548673 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 747.0 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.5969060491 60.3974514979 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.0 118.986275619 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1333333333 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.21951772744 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196074405352 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0842148877465 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137269844418 0.0758088955206 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196074405352 0.150359130593 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 14.1392134831 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 48.8420337079 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 12.1743820225 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.36 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 100.480337079 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.