Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
The fact that science and technology improved the welfare of humans is indisputable. However, since the advent of modern technology the society faced some difficulties, the advantages of science and technology overweigh the drawbacks of their utilization.
To begin with health, there has been a significant number of detrimental diseases which lead to the death of myriads of people. Most of these disease where never imagined to be healed one day and finding a remedy for them believed to be futile. A big fraction of the mortal diseases in the past is considered basic nowadays. For example, there were symptoms by vitamin C deficiency which led to the suffering and death of many people. But now, thank to science, and supplementing vitamin c in the foods, many of the people even know this problem existed once.
Mental health is getting more and more principal and one of the drawbacks of technology is its impact on exacerbating mental problems. Many scientist and psychologists believe that suffering from these abnormalities is inevitable and the number will increase in the upcoming years. Since technology just reached to a boom in the recent years with an intensified speed, there were no significant research conducted about how to overcome these problems. By time and by doing more research on the psychological impacts of technology on society a considerable amount of difficulties will be solved.
The is no doubt that technology brought many problems to the society. On the contrary, if we compare the quality of life with the past, we can see how technology ameliorated the life quality of the human being. If we compare developed countries like Switzerland with non developed countries, we observe the telling effect of science and technology on the wellbeing of their people. As long as the investigations are not only based on lucrative purposes, scientific developments will culminate to the health of the society.
Science and technology is not about creating a modern world. They can create a healthy world by taking all the difficulties of the society into consideration. As long as they are used for the welfare of the society, one day they can culminate to the state that all of the problems of the society are solved.
In conclusion, by research about the life of our ancestors and scrutiny of the lives of developed countries, we can see how technology and science improved the wellbeing of the society. To make the most of this progress, science should focus more on the benefits of the society and people rather than profitable purposes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this disease' or 'these diseases'?
Suggestion: this disease; these diseases
...the death of myriads of people. Most of these disease where never imagined to be healed one d...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 163, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagined being'.
Suggestion: imagined being
...ople. Most of these disease where never imagined to be healed one day and finding a remedy for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 136, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun scientist seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many scientists'.
Suggestion: Many scientists
...impact on exacerbating mental problems. Many scientist and psychologists believe that sufferin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 15, column 262, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ay they can culminate to the state that all of the problems of the society are solved. ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2169.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 425.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10352941176 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9440024071 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461176470588 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 686.7 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3970929004 60.3974514979 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 108.45 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284693917688 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797328996386 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0582836005368 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141866538543 0.150359130593 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554655702429 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.