Science and technology will one day be able to solve all of society’s problems.
The world not only society has been experiencing a tremendous change in appearance which can sometimes be termed a "revolution". This revoultion is base on how we make the dwelling of the universe suitable for ourselves. Many people have tried to develop somethings and they scale through which they contribute to this revolution while some tried without having impact in the revolutionize trends. Mostly the people who seems to become succesful in the breakthrough where involved in solving complex problems in the world which ordinary person might find difficult. Things like invention electricity, vehicles, bridges etc. All these things were possible with the help of science and technology. If science can be so impactful in solving the problems not walking through miles before we can be able to meet people while we spread over the world; if technology can be so useful to the extent of allowing human being get more attractive to those who are far from them through telecommunication. So why will they not be able to solve more numerous problems which could arise or probably have been detected?
I think if we retroactively check breakthrough of science and technology, we can in a small portion have the insight of possiblity of these special fields solving, if not all, but all most all the problems in the society. It can be argued that most of society problems are not necessarily been touch not to talk of solving them. Problems like society economy problems, financial problems and leadership problems. However, science have been involve in ensuring all of these problems are well tackled not only at the present but from the past. In the perspectives of economy problems such recession time, unemployment and easy access to place of work in order to ensure smooth trading in the society. The easy access to place of work was solved by providing different level of transportations such as train, airplane, ship and car. Even though all of these solutions require continous improvement over the time. We can not scrap the involvement of science and technology in the society base on the past experience..
Moreso, at present, the world is evolving tremendously with technology. But the level of advancement by the technology rapid growth is incorparable with that of science. However, science can be regarded as the building block of any technology whatsoever, which ran the garmut from touch light where principle of ohm's law was used to that of Television where Faradays law of electromagnetism was used. In the line of these, the world currently has lots of advancement that these laws had contributed in the field. At present, we talk of mobile phones, computers, artificial intelligent technology, Vehicles etc. all of which gave solutions to problems that when we imagine in the last century will be considered impossible.
Therefore, inconclusion, every problems is bound to have solutions and once the solutions can be adequately analysed then it can be solved with the use of science and technology techniques. Thus, it can be maintained with the past and present solutions that science have been realizing to profound, they will be able to give solutions to those problems which we are imagining and those we care yet encounter.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ppearance which can sometimes be termed a 'revolution'. This revoultion...
^
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ile some tried without having impact in the revolutionize trends. Mostly the people who seems to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 181, Rule ID: ALL_MOST[1]
Message: Did you mean 'almost'?
Suggestion: almost
...special fields solving, if not all, but all most all the problems in the society. It can...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 441, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'involved'.
Suggestion: involved
...ip problems. However, science have been involve in ensuring all of these problems are w...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 831, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[2]
Message: “Even though” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... such as train, airplane, ship and car. Even though all of these solutions require continou...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 997, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...d technology in the society base on the past experience.. Moreso, at present, the world is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1012, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... the society base on the past experience.. Moreso, at present, the world is e...
^^
Line 13, column 272, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...and present solutions that science have been realizing to profound, they will be able to give ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 363, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ve solutions to those problems which we are imagining and those we care yet encounter.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, i think, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 19.5258426966 154% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 86.0 58.6224719101 147% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2743.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 535.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12710280374 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80937282943 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00819040919 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478504672897 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 854.1 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1457709581 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.291666667 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2916666667 23.4991977007 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.08333333333 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285918238732 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809065234798 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653574321696 0.0758088955206 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182623908393 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0438749739449 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.