Should men and women involve in the same work even looking at physical difference?
Having known how history play major roles in selecting works for human being, most of what is now common as regard working and base on several factors can be espoused by how men perceived women in the past. Different cultures has their idiosyncrasies on the role of both men and women in the house, place of work and environmental jobs even volunteering jobs; all these examples can be seen as precedent to physical differences which differentiate the men and women in various activities.
Men are found naturally been more physical than women; as a results of how we are created. But however there are some exeption among women which background has immense impact on them and as a results using physical differences to distinguish them from men might seem not possible. For instance, A lady who engaged in wrestling jobs or a footballer will be expected to be more physique than an ordinary man who do not have interest in either of the fields. Therefore, undermine the fact that only men can do physical related works as believe by the history.
According to the history, men should be involve in the laborous activities while women should involve in languid activities. Basically agreeing with the fact that men are more physique than women. Men do outdoor jobs like farming and hunting and they do protect their vicinity from intruders while women are mostly at home engaged in houswork such as cooking, washing, and cleaning environments. However, in the modern days where technology has changed soo many things; cooking, washing
and even cleaning can be done in the matter of minutes. This indicate that all those works done by women then are really jobs nowadays. Therefore, they are forced to do more jobs to make them relevant in the society.
In conclusion, Men and women are involved in both laborious and phy
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 59, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...rally been more physical than women; as a results of how we are created. But however ther...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: BUT_NEVERTHELESS[1]
Message: Use simply 'But'.
Suggestion: But
...en; as a results of how we are created. But however there are some exeption among women whi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 191, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
...round has immense impact on them and as a results using physical differences to distingui...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 41, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'involved'?
Suggestion: involved
...According to the history, men should be involve in the laborous activities while women ...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...ged soo many things; cooking, washing and even cleaning can be done in the matter...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, really, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 33.0505617978 42% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1529.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 310.0 442.535393258 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93225806452 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63983728569 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558064516129 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.8363291792 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.615384615 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8461538462 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 5.21951772744 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362609746839 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130932157698 0.0831039109588 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0886404554096 0.0758088955206 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198137516703 0.150359130593 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615139734587 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 100.480337079 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.