Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs
They are so many interpretation that can be given to any disagreement which results from a controversial arguement. Many feels like if people dwell in a controversial topics they learn from it and capitulate, while some has a dogmatic approach to any controversial topics. In my own opinion, It depends on the several factors that will make a controversial topics either to change someone's mind or the person remains adamant towards the topics.
One thing that can be assumed from the prompt is that everybody who engage in a controversial case are always standing on their points even if it is flawed. However, this is not true for some people who really understand the main motive of an arguement.
An arguement may be an act of sharing opinion about a topic in such a way that individual involve in the arguement learnt from the controversial opinion and take a stand eventually. It can be in form of TV presentation even radio program who will raise some relevant controversial topic in the society. Now, the stand depends on the kind of people who are engaged, people who are temperament are most likely less effected in the end of the discussion and the extrovert who always feels they have the floor in any conversation. While for those who easily accept and change their mind might be the introvert who are always scared of expressing themselves in the public. Thus, ability to change people's mind is not that it boiles down to the kind of topics been discussed but rather the kind of people involved. And such discussion should not be discouraged from the society because, some people dont change afterworth.
Counsequently, the discouragement of people from discussing such topics might leads to lack of creativity from some sort of society and ability not to be insightful while deciding on issues. For instance, in a group of people who want to achieve some goal and the leader only take the floor without getting any insight from the members, However, if the leader galvernize the topics by reasoning with another perspectives. Then more insight will arised with such topics, even if they eventually not using the advice.
in conclusion, the mind of people are staunched with the kind of person; extrovert people tend to be adamant in eeasily accepting any contrasting view while that of introvert will most likely in every cases accept what is offered. So in regards to this, should we now stop discussing any controversial topics? No, although peoples attitude is hidden but only show once conversation arise, in any way, the creativity involved and counsequences is what matter a lot not the kind of people involved in the controversial talk.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 13, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun interpretation seems to be countable; consider using: 'many interpretations'.
Suggestion: many interpretations
They are so many interpretation that can be given to any disagreement w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'topic'?
Suggestion: topic
...like if people dwell in a controversial topics they learn from it and capitulate, whil...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'topic'?
Suggestion: topic
... factors that will make a controversial topics either to change someones mind or the p...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 373, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... kind of people who are engaged, people who are temperament are most likely less effect...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 894, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...d from the society because, some people dont change afterworth. Counsequently, ...
^^^^
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...y eventually not using the advice. in conclusion, the mind of people are stau...
^^
Line 17, column 235, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
... every cases accept what is offered. So in regards to this, should we now stop discussing any...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, really, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.3162921348 150% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 58.6224719101 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2229.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 450.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95333333333 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6057793516 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85754362269 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462222222222 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 698.4 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.57648341 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.117647059 118.986275619 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4705882353 23.4991977007 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.17647058824 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238120344694 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833848448754 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0359157545944 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132892857785 0.150359130593 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0383108491085 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.1392134831 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.