The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The idea that questioning the authority will improve the well-being of a society has been always a debate between different mindsets. Some people hold that questioning the authority will improve the success of the society, I however, profoundly believe that questioning the authority of the nation will enhance unruliness and can have detrimental effects on the safety of the society.
First of all, passing laws takes a long process with a myriad of research and considering many features of the society which is hidden from ordinary people of the nation. People in charge of authority are aware of the advantages and disadvantages of laws and only legitimate laws after years of consulting and investigating the potential outcomes of these actions. People however, might not have enough understanding of some of these rules and might engage their emotions in their decisions. Their opinions are mostly not realistic and have other expenses to become true that’s why the best people to decide the authority are experts aware of all the details of the legal system.
However, there were governments which enacted laws just for their own benefits, laws which don’t consider the nations natural rights such as freedom of opinion or women rights, but opposing them has to follow legal progresses in order to prevent riots and unruliness. If everyone starts to question the authority, it will eventually lose its power and less people will be committed to it.
Additionally, there are diverse lifestyles in the nation. Some rules might benefit part of the society while it might hurt the other part. For example, in America, there are contradictions about the tax laws with followers of capitalism believe that business owners have to pay less tax because the business opportunities they provided while on the contrary, middle class citizens believe that these will put all the responsibilities on the middle class people. Another instance is drug usage which some people want to be legal opposed to others who are followers of banning them. If everyone questions the authority, all of the people will be unhappy due to the diverse lifestyles and preferences.
In summary, I highly believe that if all people question the authority, it will eventually lead to unruliness and people are not familiar with all aspects of passing laws and their emotions might overshadow their logic. Because of different demands in the society, there will always be people who are not happy with the current law so the best thing to improve a well-being of a society is to send the complains to authorities who are more expert about these laws.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 358, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun people is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
..., it will eventually lose its power and less people will be committed to it. Addi...
^^^^
Line 9, column 547, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ople want to be legal opposed to others who are followers of banning them. If everyone ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 619, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...m. If everyone questions the authority, all of the people will be unhappy due to the diver...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, well, while, as to, for example, in summary, such as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2218.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14617169374 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74682148838 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473317865429 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 708.3 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3577535098 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.866666667 118.986275619 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7333333333 23.4991977007 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 5.21951772744 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174051508269 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066639470191 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440888915421 0.0758088955206 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108621016115 0.150359130593 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180987233944 0.0667264976115 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 48.8420337079 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.