The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.

Essay topics:

The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.

This topic raises the controversial issue of whether enforcing a law about strict amount of wastage generation is the best way to reduce wastage or not. Indisputably, a law in taken more seriously by people than any types of public awareness campaign. Nevertheless, some problems actually require the campaign and awareness types of activity to be resolved more efficiently. Thus, I generally disagree with the opinion that enforcing law is the best way to solve wastage problem and would argue that there are better ways.

First of all, when people are forced to follow some rules and regulations, they always tend to find a way to bypass that rule. The people making more waste than other were previously exposed to the authorities as their wastage were colltected by the authorities. But after the rule, they may plan to put their wastes privately by themselves. I would like to point out that, as they may privatelty throw the waste away, they may actually waste more.

Furthermore, the people who would actually respect the law would try to make less wastage. As a result, they will buy less products. Specifically, the products making the most wastage. In this process, the demand of many goods will decrease and this will result in fall of revenue for the businessmen of many types of prducts. Both common sense and personal experience have told us that enforcing a law doesn't actually solve the problem in question, it actually give rise to other types of problems. Hence, all the evidence above reveals that, imposing strict limits on amount of wastage does not solve the problem.

Admittedly, a law can always make the customers think before they generate any unnecessary wastage. This is true specially when people are mostly affluent and tend to use more products than necessary. In addition, it can actually teach the future generation to learn from a very small age about the bad sides of wastage and grow a concerned new generation. However, I would still disagree that implying a law is the best way to solve the problem in quesion. Because, there are other ways like raising public opinion and teaching about recycling wastage to fight this problem.

In conclusion, although a law is effective in some ways, wastage problem actually need the public awareness to solve the problem effectively. As long as some measurements are performed and some areas are involved, this claim will held true.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 119, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun products is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ess wastage. As a result, they will buy less products. Specifically, the products ma...
^^^^
Line 9, column 404, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ience have told us that enforcing a law doesnt actually solve the problem in question,...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 463, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...ve the problem in question, it actually give rise to other types of problems. Hence,...
^^^^
Line 17, column 231, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'hold'
Suggestion: hold
...ome areas are involved, this claim will held true.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, still, thus, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2025.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 404.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01237623762 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48327461151 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63642911986 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.50495049505 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 639.0 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4060826854 60.3974514979 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4285714286 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2380952381 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.21951772744 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214109169162 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0659781388686 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525759670247 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119031312968 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258762192103 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.