The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
The environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste can be solved by imposing strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household. The above solution is one of the ways to solve environmental problems. However, towns and cities should not set same maximum limit on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.
Towns and cities should not impose strict limits on same maximum amount of trash they will accept from each household. The amount of trash differs in each household. It depends on many factors like the number of people in a family, the amount of the time they spend at home. For instance, there will be more trash in the household where are more people or in the household where people spend most of their time at home. There are some people who spend most of their time outside maybe in offices and will have less amount of trash in their home. In the above cases, it will not be fair to set same maximum amount of trash they will accept from each household.
If towns and cities impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household, then it will causes problems to some people. For instance, if people set less amount of trash as maximum limit they can accept from each household, then families with more number of people will suffer. There might be some families who spend most of their time at home and may have more trash on a regular basis. These families will have to keep the extra trash at their homes which causes bad smell at their homes and may make the people in their family unhealthy by causing diseases. Towns and cities should look for alternative ways for solving environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste.
However, towns and cities should impose limits on the amount of trash they can accept from each household where the limits set differs for each household depending on their daily amount of trash which they can't avoid. The above way helps to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste. The towns and cities can impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household if they provide solution for what should be done if household cannot avoid their daily amount of trash which is more than the limit set by the towns.
Towns and cities can impose limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household for solving environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste but the limits should not be strict and the maximum limit set should not be same for each household. The maximum limit set should take all factors into consideration.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'cause'
Suggestion: cause
...ccept from each household, then it will causes problems to some people. For instance, ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... their daily amount of trash which they cant avoid. The above way helps to solve env...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, may, so, then, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 30.0 12.4196629213 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2180.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81236203091 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50759606975 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 215.323595506 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.273730684327 0.4932671777 55% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.4848649237 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.736842105 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8421052632 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.68421052632 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493820920456 0.243740707755 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.236672040367 0.0831039109588 285% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155962918061 0.0758088955206 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.401222090916 0.150359130593 267% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0922192078819 0.0667264976115 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.21 8.38706741573 74% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 100.480337079 41% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.