The best way to teach is to praise actions and ignore negative ones
The issue that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones is a contentious one. Each side has its strength and weaknesses, however, I believe that the best way to teach is to encourage positive actions and instead of ignoring, learning and rectifying the negative actions. Learning from one’s or other negative actions will always help the person to understand the difference between what is right and what is not. Furthermore, ignoring the negative action may be harmful to the individual in the future.
Firstly, Negative actions are the best source to teach the person about the mistake and moreover helps them to learn from them and not repeat the same action in the future. For example, if a child lies to his friend even for small things and if this action is not talked about or parents don’t tell the child that his or her action was wrong, the child tends to continue with the same in the future. Also, just ignoring the negative actions, the person might just imbibe the characteristic.
Secondly, it is very important to learn from the consequences of negative actions. For example, sometimes doing negative action one may be successful quickly or gain some short term achievement but it is never going to help in the long term. For example, if you know someone being corrupt to get their work done quickly. Instead of ignoring his actions, it is important to teach the right values to society and this issue must be addressed.
However, it’s also important to praise the positive action. This will encourage the person to continue doing it and build their characteristic on it. For example, a child giving out his chocolate to the poor boy sitting beside the road. The child action of sharing and caring for others need to encourage and must be praised.
In conclusion, I would say that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions and learn from the negative ones. This way of teaching will help the person to make informed choices further in life as he or she will get accustomed to understanding what is correct and what is not. Moreover, praising positive actions always provide a boost to one’s confidence. Hence it is important to make a proper balance between treating with both the actions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 276, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
... term. For example, if you know someone being corrupt to get their work done quickly....
^^^^^
Line 9, column 365, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ys provide a boost to one’s confidence. Hence it is important to make a proper balanc...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 452, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...between treating with both the actions.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, you know
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1886.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8358974359 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53888108421 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451282051282 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 576.0 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6505049247 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2631578947 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5263157895 23.4991977007 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462973841545 0.243740707755 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160862921404 0.0831039109588 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.179956474263 0.0758088955206 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276849986813 0.150359130593 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.177764017845 0.0667264976115 266% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 100.480337079 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.