Men and Women | TOEFL IELTS GMAT GRE SAT ACT PTE ESL

Essay topics:

Men and Women

The author argument of investinf more resources on unmanned space flight is flawed. The argument is based on many equivocal arguments and fails to mention several factors on the basis of which it is evaluated. The conclusion of the argument is based on the assumptions which are not clearly evident. Hence, the argument is quite flawed and implausible.

First, the series of the timeline is not clearly mention in the argument. The cryptic word recent doesn't specify like a year time or a decade. This is an important detail, as it would compare about how many time unmanned space probes and satellite provide more information than manned space flight. For example, if it is compare in past 1 year it could be case that there were only 1 manned space flight and large number of unmanned space flight and hence it is not relevant to extragent this statistically data for the future conclusion.

Furthermore, another vague word was "a great deal of useful information", it doesn't specify by how much percentage more information was provided. As the task for manned and unmanned space flight are quite different. Since, it feel the data are diffident, they are two fundamentally different things and can't be compared.

However, it is true with the risk involved in the sending the manned space flight while reenterring the earth atmosphere. However, with the current passage of time, the space aircraft have been so advanced that the risk factor is negligible. Also, there are some task in the International space station, that can't be accomplished by the unmanned flight. The above argument poist that all the task could be done by unmanned flight. This postulate is wrong as there are many task which require to show high human skills. For example, the space flight just to collect the weather data through the particular time, might not require the human monitor and unmanned flight could be consider. But some operation of maintenance in the international space station require large amount of knowledge int he field and person with the knowledge would only be part of such task. Hence his or her expertise is require and manned mission can't be neglected.

In conclusion, the argument could be more strengthen if author could explain the cryptic terms like recent, and a great deal of success. Also, the type of information collected would also help to compare between two type of flights. As it stands, the argument is flawed due to above mention points.

Votes

Essay Categories

GMAT/GRE Issue Task

Comments

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... on the basis of which it is evaluated. The conclusion of the argument is based on ...
^^^
Line 3, column 99, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...n the argument. The cryptic word recent doesnt specify like a year time or a decade. T...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...at deal of useful information', it doesnt specify by how much percentage more inf...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 237, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'feels'?
Suggestion: feels
...e flight are quite different. Since, it feel the data are diffident, they are two fu...
^^^^
Line 5, column 314, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... two fundamentally different things and cant be compared. However, it is true wi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'tasks'?
Suggestion: tasks
...tor is negligible. Also, there are some task in the International space station, tha...
^^^^
Line 7, column 310, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...n the International space station, that cant be accomplished by the unmanned flight....
^^^^
Line 7, column 469, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun task seems to be countable; consider using: 'many tasks'.
Suggestion: many tasks
...t. This postulate is wrong as there are many task which require to show high human skills...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 474, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'tasks'?
Suggestion: tasks
...is postulate is wrong as there are many task which require to show high human skills...
^^^^
Line 7, column 493, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'showing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: showing
...ng as there are many task which require to show high human skills. For example, the spa...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 866, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...wledge would only be part of such task. Hence his or her expertise is require and man...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 896, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'required'.
Suggestion: required
...uch task. Hence his or her expertise is require and manned mission cant be neglected. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 923, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...expertise is require and manned mission cant be neglected. In conclusion, the a...
^^^^
Line 10, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of flights. As it stands, the argument is flawed due to above mention points. ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 32.0 19.5258426966 164% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 413.0 442.535393258 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00726392252 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50803742585 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67643976135 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464891041162 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 644.4 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7152607669 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7727272727 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81818181818 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.243740707755 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0831039109588 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0758088955206 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150359130593 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Essay evaluations by e-grader

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, then, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments