The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
I totally agree that the best way to teach is to praise positive actions but only to certain extent. To teach is to engrain a good amount of knowledge and values in the student which later delineates that he has good sense of decorum. Students are like wet cement. Whatever values and manners they are taught in their adolescent age their results are reflected in their future life.
On the contrary, if a student misbehaves or commits something wrong it is the responsibility of his teacher to make him aware of his unacceptable action. This is important because unless and until if that student isn't aware of his actions and their result, he will always be under the thinking that whatever he does with whomsoever is correct and acceptable even if it is indecorous. Some students do not need any teacher or mentor to emphasize their mistakes or wrong actions which they happen to commit. If a student is always being praised by teacher it leaves no room for him to understand his mistakes and take action in order to improvise it.
There are multiple ways of teaching. It is totally agreeable that learning should be enjoyable and full of enthusiasm. Some teachers condone improper behaviour of student so as to maintain an image of good teacher within students which is totally wrong. If students are not getting realisation of their improper behaviour they won't get ready to accept their mistakes which they will commit in future. It's entirely teacher's responsibility to understand where to praise student and where to reprimand them. Teachers should have that level of understanding to how much extent a student should be praised or reprimanded.
Some students if reprimanded harshly take things in a negative direction and declare by themselves that a particular teacher who critisized them in improper. The responsibility of this attitude comes directly to parents of that child who always supported him for his wrong behaviour because as we say our home is our first educational institution.
In the conclusion I would like to state that praising a child on his decorous behaviour is advantageous but reprimanding them on their improper behaviour is more advantageous. The only thing is that teachers and parents should know the ways and the extent of critisizing a mistake or praising a moral action or behaviour.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...ecause unless and until if that student isnt aware of his actions and their result, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...s condone improper behaviour of student so as to maintain an image of good teacher withi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 255, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...within students which is totally wrong. If students are not getting realisation of...
^^
Line 5, column 391, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...t their mistakes which they will commit in future. Its entirely teachers responsibility t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...takes which they will commit in future. Its entirely teachers responsibility to und...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, thus, as to, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1945.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 389.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83406635734 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488431876607 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.614481924 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.055555556 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6111111111 23.4991977007 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152173412925 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628566709805 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099410560656 0.0758088955206 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0948718291135 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614694898575 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.