People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Lot of people in this world have to make decisions on every day basis no matter what is the gravity of the situation. People in their life have to deal with problems related to their mundane routine to the problems which are complex and decide their future lives. Every individual has his own perspective to look at the problems and deal with the same. The gist of the above statement is that any decision based on emotional quotient and later covered up by some sort of logical proof is likely to get failed or considered implausible and I agree to the above statement.
First of all, we humans are the most advanced race in our entire ecosystem having capabilities to think reasonably and logically. Along with these capabilities we also have developed a strong emotional quotient by birth. Any problem or situation we deal with should have a logical base. Human emotions are temporary in nature. They are nothing but our immediate reactions to anything happening or actions of people surrounding us. Basically, they are based on what we perceive about the situations. So, decisions having such a temporary base aren't considered to be right because of their inconsistency. For example, if a thief is caught by public while robbing something, immediately he is beaten by public which represent propensity towards that situation but has no logical base. This example demonstrates that how decisions taken based on emotions have no consistency and I believe that any person who comes across to the similar type situation which occurs on the spur of the moment is likely to react emotionally which has negative effects of it .
Secondly, decisions which are having emotional basis and do not have any prior logical considerations are likely to be ineffective. For example, it is very hard or rather impossible to communicate your decision having emotion as base to stake holders of a company about your particular choice because of its missing logical argument. If a logical argument is made we can adhere to that argument and present our choice or decision to anyone without any confusion. On the contrary, for example if any person needs any help or is in critical condition a logical thought at that state would mislead us from helping that person.
In the conclusion, I would like to say that logical decisions are the best decisions while dealing with any situation because of consideration of every aspect, pros and cons before jumping to decision will never mislead nor will have any negative repercussions. But situations demanding decision having emotions will always get solved which has little logical thought and more inclined towards emotions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 572, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ble and I agree to the above statement. First of all, we humans are the most adv...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
... decisions having such a temporary base arent considered to be right because of their...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1051, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ionally which has negative effects of it . Secondly, decisions which are ha...
^^
Line 5, column 1054, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ally which has negative effects of it . Secondly, decisions which are having emo...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, while, for example, sort of, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2228.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05215419501 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75056555271 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507936507937 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 740.7 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.9824387604 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.263157895 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2105263158 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68421052632 5.21951772744 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31686416846 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103275082772 0.0831039109588 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658293106122 0.0758088955206 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21766320741 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026228816226 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 100.480337079 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.