Teaching in a right way is a very debatable issue because some person does not know enough information about choosing the right method and face with several problems during their teaching. Although praising positive actions and ignoring negative ones is a good method to teach how people should behave in their society, it is not enough and best.
When kids try to distinguish among positive actions and negative ones, the feedback from their parents and teachers plays important role. If their parents and teachers praise their actions, they know that their actions are positive, and they do not pay attention to other key factors like their situations, circumstances and times. While their parents should explain why their actions were positive and should convince them by rendering strong examples about the positive consequence of their children's actions.
Parents and teachers also could illustrate the bad consequence of children’s negative actions and clarify different kinds of circumstances for kids in order to learn them the concepts of positive and negative actions instead of praising or ignoring their actions. The most proportion of kids would not be able to realize why their actions should be ignored at certain situations. Therefore, definition of bad and good concepts plays an important role at the education systems because it makes a contribution to distinguish different circumstances and act correctly.
When people praise positive actions without persuasive reasons, little by little they forget why these actions are laudable which will eventually lead to decreasing the action’s value. Furthermore, they would not be able to explain them for their next generations correctly. For example, when people praise fidelity as a positive action between a couple without considering the significant consequence of fidelity on couple’s later life. The value of fidelity will be missed among next generations, and they will not realize why fidelity is praised.
The most percentage of people also ignores some actions without investigating their effect on their life. For instance, people know that lying is a very negative action but they do not try to forbid it. They justify themselves with ignoring it and advice their children about it. While they could explain why lying is not a positive action and its consequences make an irreversible damage. Denying a negative action is not enough because people forget the profound effect of this action in their life.
In conclusion, the best way to teach is to explain the effect of positive and negative actions at people’s later life and notify them about the chain of consequence that these actions have. Definition of positive and negative is subjective and people will be confused if they do not have had enough information about the reasons that both negative actions and positive actions have.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
Teaching in a right way is a very debatable issue because some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 366, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'irreversible damage'.
Suggestion: irreversible damage
...sitive action and its consequences make an irreversible damage. Denying a negative action is not enoug...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35164835165 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71509619968 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41978021978 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0268276829 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.157894737 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372434822615 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135693146056 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118433015396 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225596496371 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906714170271 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a right way" with adverb for "right"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
Teaching in a right way is a very debatable issue because some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 366, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'irreversible damage'.
Suggestion: irreversible damage
...sitive action and its consequences make an irreversible damage. Denying a negative action is not enoug...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35164835165 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71509619968 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41978021978 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 747.9 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0268276829 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.157894737 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9473684211 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73684210526 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372434822615 0.243740707755 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135693146056 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118433015396 0.0758088955206 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225596496371 0.150359130593 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906714170271 0.0667264976115 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.