The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Throughout the history, teaching plays a pivotal role in enhancing the spirit of each society. A controversial question regarding this issue is whether praising actions and ignoring the negative ones are the best method to teach or not. Some people are inclined towards the opinion that because praising positive actions encourage people to be interested in doing them, the best way to teach is praise positives actions only. But I, despite the general consensus, believes that for having more effective teaching, people should determine both positive and negative actions. In what follows, I will aptly explain my viewpoints.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that hardly can anyone deny the facts that negative actions are as important as the positive ones because the wrong actions are such as mirror which reflects the wrong ways. Hence, if the authorities introducing the wrong actions as unacceptable activities which are blamed by people, people can figure out what is wrong and what is true. In addition, this way to teach will have a profound impact on juveniles. In other words, obviously, juveniles have the sensitive age and malleable character. In addition, they are not enough mature, and subsequently, are more influenced by their peers and celebrated persons. Furthermore, because of gap generation, never do they pay head to counsels mentioned by their parents, since considering them some ironic allusions. Hence, if media and authorities show the wrong actions which may be acted by the famous people, juveniles will pay more attention to opt the samples for mimicking.
Another equally significant point t be mentioned is that showing both correct and false actions, and subsequently, praising the good actions and punishing the false ones will show people the results of each action. In other words, people can understand they are responsible for their activities. Because their activities directly affect other mankind' lives, if they make a mistake, they endeavor to compensate it. Accordingly, if only praising the correct actions and ignore wrong ones, we will conceal the effects of the wrong actions. As a result, never can people see what has happened if they do wrong actions. To illustrate, supposing the cruel leader who made people's lives so hard, causes many people to die, and so forth. Hence, in the history class, if the teacher only praises correct actions, he never can teach his students not to support the cruel leader.
In a nutshell, contemplating all the above-mentioned reasons, one soon realizes that encouraging people to follow good actions and being responsible for their activities, both, are the prominent reasons why the authorities should pay more attention to both, good and wrong, activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 446, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...itives actions only. But I, despite the general consensus, believes that for having more effectiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 543, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... sensitive age and malleable character. In addition, they are not enough mature, a...
^^
Line 6, column 287, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on to both, good and wrong, activities.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, regarding, so, in addition, such as, as a result, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2326.0 2235.4752809 104% => OK
No of words: 441.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27437641723 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58257569496 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75617589628 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 711.0 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.38483146067 274% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1906353408 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.3 118.986275619 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.05 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.21951772744 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286298480391 0.243740707755 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834362098035 0.0831039109588 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112490170763 0.0758088955206 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181923487774 0.150359130593 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.159589488368 0.0667264976115 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.