The first step to self-knowledge is rejection of the familiar.
During history, everyone has been engaged a strong struggle to recognize himself. A controversial question regarding this issue is whether rejecting of the familiar is the first step to self-knowledge or not. Some people are inclined towards the opinion that because people's personalities are formed separately, the best way to self-knowledge is a rejection of the familiar. But I, despite the general consensus, disagree with this statement due to some reasons. In what follows, I will aptly explain my viewpoints.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that hardly can anyone deny the fact children are influenced where they live, and subsequently, their personalities and special features are shaped. In other words, how their parents live directly affect how they live, and subsequently, what is acceptable for their parents becomes what children’ beliefs in the future. In addition, if they come across the opposite views, they consider them as some ironic allusions. Hence, these primary characteristics become the main part of their personalities which hardly can be changed. As a result, if people want to start to recognize themselves, firstly, they should become familiar with their families.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that the familiar plays a pivotal role in shaping the talents of people. In other words, parents' talents and capabilities inherently will permeate the children. If one person wants to become successful in his profession, he should first become familiar with his parents. The best musicians, artists, leaders, and so forth are the people who have the familiar with a similar feature.
In a nutshell, contemplating all above-mentioned, one soon having the profound impacts on children and conveying some talents inherently to children, both, are the main reason why everyone wants to start self-knowledge, firstly should inform about familiar.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 395, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...ion of the familiar. But I, despite the general consensus, disagree with this statement due to so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d become familiar with their families. Another equally significant point to be ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, regarding, so, in addition, as a result, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 295.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.51525423729 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08052607647 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579661016949 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 704.065955056 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.2051790157 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.466666667 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26016139008 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844320195028 0.0831039109588 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141537725571 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16455576247 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.126450492219 0.0667264976115 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.