Claim: In any field—business, politics, education, government—those in power should step down after five years.
Reason: The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership.
Today's world has radically changed during the recent century, which in turn has directly affected the governing style. A controversial question regarding this issue is that whether all people who are in power I any field like politics, education, and so forth should step down after five years or not. Some people are inclined towards the opinion that the people being in power should govern the country for a long time because many programs which they determine need more time. But I, despite the general consensus, believe that they should step down every five years due to some reasons. In what follows, I will aptly explain my viewpoints.
The first exquisite point to be mentioned is that hardly can anyone deny the fact that there are vast kinds of groups with variety believes in each nation. Accordingly, it is crystal-clear that never can the people who are in power satisfy all people. Hence, if the government want to preserve its integrity, it should regard to all believes and interests. As a matter of fact, people who do not compromise the current government will be hopeful that next leaders will be difference and according to their beliefs. Also, it is obvious that in countries changing their politicians every five years, people play a pivotal role in governing their countries because the leaders should be chosen according to people's votes. As a result, because people are responsible for opting who is in power, they will cooperate to improve (in development) their country. In addition, the policy in this country not only causes the people to struggle to select the person who is best but also the leaders endeavor to satisfy people.
Another equally significant point to be mentioned is that stepping down the people who are in power every five years has a profound impact on decreasing the economic corruption. In other words, because knowing that they will be changed every five years, the politicians will try to satisfy people while governing the country for a long time provides a big opportunity for politicians to increase their power. Hence, they will be able to suppress the opponents with ease. In addition, the policy of leading the country directly affects the people's beliefs. As a matter of fact, in many countries, people see / worship the leaders as GOD, and subsequently, any objection will be determined as big guilt which is not forgivable. Thereupon, although the leader may be the cruel person, people are not enough brave to show their objections. Furthermore, this superstition deeply permeate humans' thinking and makes the slave-master structure. Accordingly, politicians easily can obsess residents without any obstacles. In contrast, changing the politicians every five years assist people to see the politicians and leaders through a new lens because figuring out that there is no difference between the leader and general people.
In a nutshell, contemplating all above-mentioned reasons, one soon realizes that leading the country by people and avoiding the cruel behavior in the country, both, are the main reasons why the politicans, bussinessman, and to name a few should step down after five years. Hence, I strongly suggest that authorities put more emphasis on both leaders aspect and policies in the government.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 499, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'consensus'.
Suggestion: consensus
...mine need more time. But I, despite the general consensus, believe that they should step down eve...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 692, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to accord'.
Suggestion: to accord
...es because the leaders should be chosen according to peoples votes. As a result, because ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 705, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...e leaders should be chosen according to peoples votes. As a result, because people are ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 343, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
...t authorities put more emphasis on both leaders aspect and policies in the government. ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, may, regarding, so, while, in addition, in contrast, as a matter of fact, as a result, in my view, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.3162921348 194% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 58.6224719101 104% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2746.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 534.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14232209738 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80712388197 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74406528966 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 259.0 215.323595506 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485018726592 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 843.3 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.1080396153 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.391304348 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2173913043 23.4991977007 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30434782609 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180355780102 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542681828601 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629638934624 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131226481922 0.150359130593 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058910196438 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 100.480337079 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.